<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
			xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
		>

<channel>
	<title>Gigaom Search &#187; Companies &#187; Federal Trade Commission (FTC)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://search.gigaom.com/company/federal-trade-commission-ftc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://search.gigaom.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2015 13:08:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>FTC&#8217;s Brill sees consumer consent as key for health, finance apps</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2015/03/06/ftcs-brill-sees-consumer-consent-as-key-for-health-finance-apps/</link>
		<comments>http://gigaom.com/2015/03/06/ftcs-brill-sees-consumer-consent-as-key-for-health-finance-apps/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2015 14:30:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Roberts]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal-trade-commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health apps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julie Brill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Structure Data 2015]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=918827</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When normal people use a new app, they don't wade through hidden service terms. Many just click "OK" and hope for the best. This might be fine for a game of Candy Crush, but&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://gigaom.com/2015/03/06/ftcs-brill-sees-consumer-consent-as-key-for-health-finance-apps/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Here&#8217;s a draft of the consumer privacy &#8220;Bill of Rights&#8221; act Obama wants to pass</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2015/02/27/consumer-privacy-bill-of-rights-act-draft/</link>
		<comments>http://gigaom.com/2015/02/27/consumer-privacy-bill-of-rights-act-draft/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2015 23:34:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Carmel DeAmicis]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal-trade-commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=917802</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The White House has released a draft of the Consumer Privacy Bill of Rights Act of 2015. It outlines the steps companies need to take to tell people what data they're&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://gigaom.com/2015/02/27/consumer-privacy-bill-of-rights-act-draft/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AT&amp;T charges $29 for privacy. Time for others to do the same</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2015/02/17/att-charges-29-for-privacy-time-for-others-to-do-the-same/</link>
		<comments>http://gigaom.com/2015/02/17/att-charges-29-for-privacy-time-for-others-to-do-the-same/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2015 15:41:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Roberts]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AT&T GigaPower]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Austin fiber]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kansas City fiber]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NASDAQ:FB]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NSDQ:FB]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NYSE:T]]></category>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=915188</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AT&#38;T just rolled out blazing fast fiber-to-home internet service in Kansas City for $70 a month. But there's a catch: customers who don't want the telecom giant spying on their web surfing will&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://gigaom.com/2015/02/17/att-charges-29-for-privacy-time-for-others-to-do-the-same/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>41</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oracle paid north of $1.2B for Datalogix, says WSJ</title>
		<link>https://gigaom.com/2015/02/05/oracle-paid-1-2b-for-datalogix-says-wsj/</link>
		<comments>https://gigaom.com/2015/02/05/oracle-paid-1-2b-for-datalogix-says-wsj/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2015 13:49:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Barb Darrow]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data aggregation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Datalogix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Structure Data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Structure:Data]]></category>
<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NASDAQ:FB]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NASDAQ:ORCL]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NSDQ:FB]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NYSE:F]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NYSE:TWTR]]></category>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=912705</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Right before Christmas, when  announced plans to buy Datalogix it didn't detail price. Now, The Wall Street Journal, (paywall)  is filling in the blanks, reporting that the price tag is $1.2 billion, according to two&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://gigaom.com/2015/02/05/oracle-paid-1-2b-for-datalogix-says-wsj/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FTC shuts down &#8220;revenge porn&#8221; operation, but imposes no fine</title>
		<link>https://gigaom.com/2015/01/29/ftc-shuts-down-revenge-porn-operation-but-imposes-no-fine/</link>
		<comments>https://gigaom.com/2015/01/29/ftc-shuts-down-revenge-porn-operation-but-imposes-no-fine/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2015 17:28:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Roberts]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Craig Brittain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Trade Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julie Brill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Revenge porn]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=910885</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In one of the most despicable scams on the internet, Colorado resident Craig Brittain ran a website that posted nude photographs of hundreds of women alongside their Facebook profiles and other&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://gigaom.com/2015/01/29/ftc-shuts-down-revenge-porn-operation-but-imposes-no-fine/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Firms may face new $16,500 privacy fines under White House bill</title>
		<link>https://gigaom.com/2015/01/28/firms-may-face-new-16500-privacy-fines-under-white-house-bill/</link>
		<comments>https://gigaom.com/2015/01/28/firms-may-face-new-16500-privacy-fines-under-white-house-bill/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2015 02:14:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Roberts]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Trade Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julie Brill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy law]]></category>
<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NASDAQ:FB]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NASDAQ:GOOG]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NSDQ:FB]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NSDQ:GOOG]]></category>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=910748</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many consumers have grown resigned to the parade of privacy breaches that occur when apps or big tech companies like Facebook or Google misuse their personal data. These incidents typically result in a slap on the&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://gigaom.com/2015/01/28/firms-may-face-new-16500-privacy-fines-under-white-house-bill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TracFone fined $40M for selling unlimited plans with clear limits</title>
		<link>https://gigaom.com/2015/01/28/tracfone-fined-40m-for-selling-unlimited-plans-with-clear-limits/</link>
		<comments>https://gigaom.com/2015/01/28/tracfone-fined-40m-for-selling-unlimited-plans-with-clear-limits/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2015 20:45:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin Fitchard]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data plans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[settlement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[throttling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unlimited Plans]]></category>
<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NYSE:T]]></category>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=910624</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Federal Trade Commission is putting mobile carriers on notice that if they advertise an unlimited plan they can’t monkey around with speeds -- or at least must clearly disclose their&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://gigaom.com/2015/01/28/tracfone-fined-40m-for-selling-unlimited-plans-with-clear-limits/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Yelp says FTC investigation shows its reviews are not fixed</title>
		<link>https://gigaom.com/2015/01/06/yelp-says-ftc-investigation-shows-its-reviews-are-not-fixed/</link>
		<comments>https://gigaom.com/2015/01/06/yelp-says-ftc-investigation-shows-its-reviews-are-not-fixed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2015 22:45:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Roberts]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Trade Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Review websites]]></category>
<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NYSE:YELP]]></category>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=904705</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Customer review site Yelp can be a source of stress for small business owners, who fear that a poor ranking or negative comment can sabotage sales. Some businesses even claim that Yelp&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://gigaom.com/2015/01/06/yelp-says-ftc-investigation-shows-its-reviews-are-not-fixed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Feds issue final order over Snapchat privacy incidents, but no fine</title>
		<link>https://gigaom.com/2014/12/31/feds-issue-final-order-over-snapchat-privacy-breach-but-no-fine/</link>
		<comments>https://gigaom.com/2014/12/31/feds-issue-final-order-over-snapchat-privacy-breach-but-no-fine/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2014 17:01:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Roberts]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consent decree]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data breach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Trade Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=903378</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What do regulators do when a popular app deceives users about photos that "disappear forever" and scrapes their contact list without permission? Not much. On Wednesday morning, the Federal Trade Commission announced the approval&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://gigaom.com/2014/12/31/feds-issue-final-order-over-snapchat-privacy-breach-but-no-fine/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft sues fake tech support service, warns of holiday scams</title>
		<link>https://gigaom.com/2014/12/18/microsoft-sues-fake-tech-support-service-warns-of-holiday-scams/</link>
		<comments>https://gigaom.com/2014/12/18/microsoft-sues-fake-tech-support-service-warns-of-holiday-scams/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2014 21:04:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Roberts]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Customer Focused Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marc Haberman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OmniTech Support]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tech support scams]]></category>
<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NASDAQ:MSFT]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NSDQ:MSFT]]></category>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=901597</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Microsoft filed a lawsuit on Thursday against a bogus tech support service that allegedly used the company's name to persuade victims, many of them seniors, to pay hundreds of dollars for worthless&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://gigaom.com/2014/12/18/microsoft-sues-fake-tech-support-service-warns-of-holiday-scams/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>