<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
			xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
		>

<channel>
	<title>Gigaom Search &#187; Companies &#187; U.S. Supreme Court</title>
	<atom:link href="http://search.gigaom.com/company/u-s-supreme-court/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://search.gigaom.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2015 13:08:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Internet retailers face looming duty to collect out-of-state tax</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2015/03/04/internet-retailers-face-looming-duty-to-collect-out-of-state-tax/</link>
		<comments>http://gigaom.com/2015/03/04/internet-retailers-face-looming-duty-to-collect-out-of-state-tax/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2015 15:20:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Roberts]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet sales tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice Kennedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketplace Fairness Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online retailers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quill Corp. v. North Dakota]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=918726</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Online shopping is hugely popular but not with state governments. For years, states have complained the internet shopping boom is costing them billions in tax revenue thanks to a long-standing law that prevents them from&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://gigaom.com/2015/03/04/internet-retailers-face-looming-duty-to-collect-out-of-state-tax/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Forget TV, let&#8217;s put the Supreme Court on YouTube</title>
		<link>https://gigaom.com/2015/01/26/forget-tv-lets-put-the-supreme-court-on-youtube/</link>
		<comments>https://gigaom.com/2015/01/26/forget-tv-lets-put-the-supreme-court-on-youtube/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2015 22:55:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Roberts]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Access to Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cameras in the courtroom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citizens United]]></category>
<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NASDAQ:GOOG]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NSDQ:GOOG]]></category>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=909786</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Supreme Court is now on YouTube -- sort of. A clandestine video from the court has turned up on the popular video-sharing platform, showing moments of last week's outbursts in which protestors harangued the&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://gigaom.com/2015/01/26/forget-tv-lets-put-the-supreme-court-on-youtube/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Brands can&#8217;t use copyright to stop resales, court confirms</title>
		<link>https://gigaom.com/2015/01/21/brands-cant-use-copyright-to-stop-resales-court-confirms/</link>
		<comments>https://gigaom.com/2015/01/21/brands-cant-use-copyright-to-stop-resales-court-confirms/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2015 16:59:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Roberts]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[9th circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright misuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[first sale doctrine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kirtsaeng]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Omega v Costco]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=908131</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In 2013, the fate of everything from used bookstores to neighborhood garage sales hung in the balance as the Supreme Court decided whether it was legal for people to sell secondhand goods without the&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://gigaom.com/2015/01/21/brands-cant-use-copyright-to-stop-resales-court-confirms/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court strips more power from controversial patent court</title>
		<link>https://gigaom.com/2015/01/20/supreme-court-strips-more-power-from-controversial-patent-court/</link>
		<comments>https://gigaom.com/2015/01/20/supreme-court-strips-more-power-from-controversial-patent-court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2015 17:26:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Roberts]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[claim construction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice Alex Kozinski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Posner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandoz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[standard of review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Breyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Teva pharmaceuticals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Teva Pharmaceuticals v Sandoz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Teva v Sandoz]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=907845</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Supreme Court issued a ruling Tuesday that will have a significant impact on the patent system by limiting the ability of the Federal Circuit, a specialized court that hears patent appeals, to&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://gigaom.com/2015/01/20/supreme-court-strips-more-power-from-controversial-patent-court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The trouble with the Supreme Court&#8217;s go-slow approach to tech</title>
		<link>https://gigaom.com/2015/01/02/the-trouble-with-the-supreme-courts-go-slow-approach-to-tech/</link>
		<comments>https://gigaom.com/2015/01/02/the-trouble-with-the-supreme-courts-go-slow-approach-to-tech/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2015 18:04:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Roberts]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chief Justice Roberts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal judiciary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PACER]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=903520</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Chief Justice John Roberts published a report on the judiciary this week, and much of his meditation focused on technology, and courts' historical reluctance to adopt it. He described, for instance, how the Supreme&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://gigaom.com/2015/01/02/the-trouble-with-the-supreme-courts-go-slow-approach-to-tech/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court sides with Amazon in worker security screening case</title>
		<link>https://gigaom.com/2014/12/09/supreme-court-sides-with-amazon-in-worker-security-screening-case/</link>
		<comments>https://gigaom.com/2014/12/09/supreme-court-sides-with-amazon-in-worker-security-screening-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2014 15:31:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Roberts]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Busk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment law]]></category>
<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NASDAQ:AAPL]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NASDAQ:AMZN]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NSDQ:AAPL]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NSDQ:AMZN]]></category>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=899194</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Supreme Court handed employers a clear victory on Tuesday, ruling 9-0 that Amazon does not have to compensate workers for the time they spend waiting to clear security searches at the end&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://gigaom.com/2014/12/09/supreme-court-sides-with-amazon-in-worker-security-screening-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook threats and the Supreme Court: a guide to today&#8217;s case</title>
		<link>https://gigaom.com/2014/12/01/facebook-threats-and-the-supreme-court-a-guide-to-todays-case/</link>
		<comments>https://gigaom.com/2014/12/01/facebook-threats-and-the-supreme-court-a-guide-to-todays-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2014 11:01:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Roberts]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elonis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[first amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[threats]]></category>
<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NASDAQ:FB]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NSDQ:FB]]></category>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=897067</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Supreme Court on Monday will hear the appeal of a man who went to prison for posting violent rants on Facebook. The case will shape the future of what people&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://gigaom.com/2014/12/01/facebook-threats-and-the-supreme-court-a-guide-to-todays-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Computer experts push Supreme Court to hear Google&#8217;s appeal in API copyright case</title>
		<link>https://gigaom.com/2014/11/10/computer-experts-push-supreme-court-to-hear-googles-appeal-in-api-copyright-case/</link>
		<comments>https://gigaom.com/2014/11/10/computer-experts-push-supreme-court-to-hear-googles-appeal-in-api-copyright-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2014 14:39:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Roberts]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal circuit]]></category>
<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NASDAQ:GOOG]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NASDAQ:ORCL]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NSDQ:GOOG]]></category>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=887494</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Can companies like Oracle exert copyright over basic software instructions? A new petition from leading computer scientists makes it more likely the Supreme Court will hear an appeal of a decision&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://gigaom.com/2014/11/10/computer-experts-push-supreme-court-to-hear-googles-appeal-in-api-copyright-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Puppy justice: How John Oliver won the Internet</title>
		<link>https://gigaom.com/2014/10/20/puppy-justice-how-john-oliver-won-the-internet/</link>
		<comments>https://gigaom.com/2014/10/20/puppy-justice-how-john-oliver-won-the-internet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2014 18:21:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Janko Roettgers]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John liver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[memes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[puppies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remixing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=882160</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Supreme Court does not allow cameras in the court room, so John Oliver decided to reenact a case with dogs -- and then release the raw footage to remix on&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://gigaom.com/2014/10/20/puppy-justice-how-john-oliver-won-the-internet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google urges Supreme Court to act on Oracle ruling, shut down copyright claims on APIs</title>
		<link>https://gigaom.com/2014/10/09/google-urges-supreme-court-to-act-on-oracle-ruling-shut-down-copyright-claims-on-apis/</link>
		<comments>https://gigaom.com/2014/10/09/google-urges-supreme-court-to-act-on-oracle-ruling-shut-down-copyright-claims-on-apis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2014 19:33:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Roberts]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal circuit]]></category>
<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NASDAQ:GOOG]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NASDAQ:ORCL]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NSDQ:GOOG]]></category>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=879658</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Unless the Supreme Court steps in, companies like Oracle are set to own small pieces of code that are the basic building blocks used by developers in all sorts of technology&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://gigaom.com/2014/10/09/google-urges-supreme-court-to-act-on-oracle-ruling-shut-down-copyright-claims-on-apis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>