<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
			xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
		>

<channel>
	<title>Gigaom Search &#187; People &#187; Jeff Jarvis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://search.gigaom.com/person/jeff-jarvis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://search.gigaom.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2015 13:08:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Verizon to finally sell and activate Google Nexus 7 LTE tablets, starting Feb. 13</title>
		<link>https://gigaom.com/2014/02/10/verizon-to-finally-sell-and-activate-google-nexus-7-lte-tablets-starting-feb-13/</link>
		<comments>https://gigaom.com/2014/02/10/verizon-to-finally-sell-and-activate-google-nexus-7-lte-tablets-starting-feb-13/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Feb 2014 21:13:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin C. Tofel]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NSDQ:GOOG]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NYSE:VZ]]></category>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=815522</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google's Nexus 7 debuted last July with a Wi-Fi model, followed by an LTE version. It's only now that Verizon is selling the device as it took six months to certify&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://gigaom.com/2014/02/10/verizon-to-finally-sell-and-activate-google-nexus-7-lte-tablets-starting-feb-13/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What the New York Times redesign can teach us about work management</title>
		<link>http://research.gigaom.com/2014/01/what-the-new-york-times-redesign-can-teach-us/</link>
		<comments>http://research.gigaom.com/2014/01/what-the-new-york-times-redesign-can-teach-us/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jan 2014 20:50:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stowe Boyd]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>
<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NYSE:NYT]]></category>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://research.gigaom.com/?p=212069</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Whether we are reading our daily newspaper online, or logging into our company work management solution to catch up on what others are doing, many of the same questions about presentation&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://research.gigaom.com/2014/01/what-the-new-york-times-redesign-can-teach-us/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The new writer&#8217;s dilemma: You wrote something really great &#8212; now, where do you put it?</title>
		<link>https://gigaom.com/2013/05/28/the-new-writers-dilemma-you-wrote-something-really-great-now-where-do-you-put-it/</link>
		<comments>https://gigaom.com/2013/05/28/the-new-writers-dilemma-you-wrote-something-really-great-now-where-do-you-put-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2013 22:14:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mathew Ingram]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future of media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magazines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publishing]]></category>
<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NYSE:LNKD]]></category>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.org/?p=230023</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the proliferation of new publishing platforms -- and not just blogs or social networks, but also all-digital publishers like Medium, LinkedIn and the Huffington Post -- how does a writer&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://gigaom.com/2013/05/28/the-new-writers-dilemma-you-wrote-something-really-great-now-where-do-you-put-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Attention, distraction, and the social dilemma</title>
		<link>http://research.gigaom.com/2012/12/attention-distraction-and-the-social-dilemma/</link>
		<comments>http://research.gigaom.com/2012/12/attention-distraction-and-the-social-dilemma/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2012 14:34:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stowe Boyd]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anne-Laure Fayard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Distraction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meditation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Noise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open plan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publicy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social density]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social dilemma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Valtteri Hongisto]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pro.gigaom.com/?post_type=go_shortpost&#038;p=163472</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Perhaps it's the holiday season, with the predictable end-of-year, what-does-it-all-mean columns, and the growing sense of being pressed for time as we head for a few compressed days of egg nog&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://research.gigaom.com/2012/12/attention-distraction-and-the-social-dilemma/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thanks to Quora, now you can&#8217;t read anonymously</title>
		<link>https://gigaom.com/2012/08/01/thanks-to-quora-now-you-cant-read-anonymously/</link>
		<comments>https://gigaom.com/2012/08/01/thanks-to-quora-now-you-cant-read-anonymously/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2012 20:04:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Om Malik]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liz Gannes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marc Bodnick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Lurking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Passive sharing]]></category>
<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NASDAQ:FB]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NSDQ:FB]]></category>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=549174</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Quora launched a new feature that essentially takes away the option of reading anonymously (unless you opt-out) on its platform. This is part of the growing trend of passive sharing involving&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://gigaom.com/2012/08/01/thanks-to-quora-now-you-cant-read-anonymously/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>30</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The future of media and forcing new content into old models</title>
		<link>https://gigaom.com/2012/07/05/the-future-of-media-and-forcing-new-content-into-old-models/</link>
		<comments>https://gigaom.com/2012/07/05/the-future-of-media-and-forcing-new-content-into-old-models/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2012 16:34:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mathew Ingram]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future of media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journatic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Outsourcing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Startups]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=539750</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The controversy over new-media startup Journatic and its hyper-local news service says a lot about how difficult it is to find new ways of producing journalism, in part because the traditional&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://gigaom.com/2012/07/05/the-future-of-media-and-forcing-new-content-into-old-models/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why we need to blow the article up in order to save it</title>
		<link>https://gigaom.com/2012/05/30/why-we-need-to-blow-the-article-up-in-order-to-save-it/</link>
		<comments>https://gigaom.com/2012/05/30/why-we-need-to-blow-the-article-up-in-order-to-save-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 22:11:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mathew Ingram]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future of media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magazines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NASDAQ:FB]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NSDQ:FB]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NYSE:TWTR]]></category>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=527141</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many media outlets still think of the story or the article as the atomic unit of journalism -- but with so many competing sources of information and the real-time nature of&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://gigaom.com/2012/05/30/why-we-need-to-blow-the-article-up-in-order-to-save-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What does the journalism of the future look like?</title>
		<link>https://gigaom.com/2011/06/13/what-does-the-journalism-of-the-future-look-like/</link>
		<comments>https://gigaom.com/2011/06/13/what-does-the-journalism-of-the-future-look-like/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 20:13:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mathew Ingram]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future of media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real-time feeds]]></category>
<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NYSE:NYT]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NYSE:TWTR]]></category>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=360307</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We've spent so long consuming the news in fairly predictable formats that the new forms of journalism we are seeing all around us can be confusing. But these new forms have&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://gigaom.com/2011/06/13/what-does-the-journalism-of-the-future-look-like/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reality Check for News: Guilt Trips Aren&#8217;t a Business Model</title>
		<link>https://gigaom.com/2011/04/25/reality-check-for-news-guilt-trips-arent-a-business-model/</link>
		<comments>https://gigaom.com/2011/04/25/reality-check-for-news-guilt-trips-arent-a-business-model/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2011 22:11:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mathew Ingram]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future of media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publishing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=335830</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Author and media consultant Jeff Jarvis has come up with a breakdown of what he calls some "hard economic lessons for news," and it makes for somewhat gloomy reading indeed. That&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://gigaom.com/2011/04/25/reality-check-for-news-guilt-trips-arent-a-business-model/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jarvis: Publicness Needs Its Advocates, Just Like Privacy</title>
		<link>https://gigaom.com/2011/02/17/jarvis-publicness-needs-its-advocates-just-like-privacy/</link>
		<comments>https://gigaom.com/2011/02/17/jarvis-publicness-needs-its-advocates-just-like-privacy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2011 21:03:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mathew Ingram]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publicness]]></category>
<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NASDAQ:FB]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NSDQ:FB]]></category>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=299326</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Author Jeff Jarvis this morning told a conference of privacy advocates something many of them probably didn't want to hear: that society needs more protection for what he calls "publicness," and&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://gigaom.com/2011/02/17/jarvis-publicness-needs-its-advocates-just-like-privacy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
