<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
			xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
		>

<channel>
	<title>Gigaom Search &#187; People &#187; Nate Silver</title>
	<atom:link href="http://search.gigaom.com/person/nate-silver/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://search.gigaom.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2015 04:34:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>When it comes to elections, data journalism without context is noise</title>
		<link>https://gigaom.com/2014/11/04/when-it-comes-to-elections-data-journalism-without-context-is-noise/</link>
		<comments>https://gigaom.com/2014/11/04/when-it-comes-to-elections-data-journalism-without-context-is-noise/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2014 18:56:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Derrick Harris]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=885792</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nate Silver and his ilk have proven they can predict elections with high accuracy, so maybe it's time to move on from focusing on the forecasts. I know Republicans will likely&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://gigaom.com/2014/11/04/when-it-comes-to-elections-data-journalism-without-context-is-noise/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Data journalism could use a jolt of data science, too</title>
		<link>https://gigaom.com/2014/07/09/data-journalism-could-use-a-jolt-of-data-science-too/</link>
		<comments>https://gigaom.com/2014/07/09/data-journalism-could-use-a-jolt-of-data-science-too/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2014 21:32:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Derrick Harris]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vox]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=856489</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Nieman Journalism Lab published a thoughtful critique of data journalism on Wednesday, but there are additional things the emerging space could do live up to its hype, including getting more&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://gigaom.com/2014/07/09/data-journalism-could-use-a-jolt-of-data-science-too/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>He said/she said isn&#8217;t just a failure of journalism, it&#8217;s a failure to understand the media market</title>
		<link>https://gigaom.com/2014/05/12/he-saidshe-said-isnt-just-a-failure-of-journalism-its-a-failure-to-understand-the-media-market/</link>
		<comments>https://gigaom.com/2014/05/12/he-saidshe-said-isnt-just-a-failure-of-journalism-its-a-failure-to-understand-the-media-market/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2014 17:52:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mathew Ingram]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[balance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Objectivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vox]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=840963</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As Jay Rosen argues, the days when it was enough to just give both sides of a story -- without providing any additional viewpoints or fact-checking -- are over. He said/she&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://gigaom.com/2014/05/12/he-saidshe-said-isnt-just-a-failure-of-journalism-its-a-failure-to-understand-the-media-market/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Upshot vs. Vox vs. FiveThirtyEight: A hands-on review of explanatory journalism</title>
		<link>https://gigaom.com/2014/04/22/the-upshot-vs-vox-vs-fivethirtyeight-a-hands-on-review-of-explanatory-journalism/</link>
		<comments>https://gigaom.com/2014/04/22/the-upshot-vs-vox-vs-fivethirtyeight-a-hands-on-review-of-explanatory-journalism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2014 18:31:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mathew Ingram]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[journalism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=836052</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the launch of The Upshot from the New York Times, there are now three major sites going after the "explanatory journalism" market. Each has its own unique flavor, but is&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://gigaom.com/2014/04/22/the-upshot-vs-vox-vs-fivethirtyeight-a-hands-on-review-of-explanatory-journalism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Here comes The Upshot, the new explanatory journalism effort from the New York Times</title>
		<link>https://gigaom.com/2014/04/21/here-comes-the-upshot-the-new-explanatory-journalism-effort-from-the-new-york-times/</link>
		<comments>https://gigaom.com/2014/04/21/here-comes-the-upshot-the-new-explanatory-journalism-effort-from-the-new-york-times/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2014 22:54:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mathew Ingram]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[journalism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=835853</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The New York Times is launching The Upshot, a new site that its editor says will offer a combination of data journalism and explanatory reporting -- and also try to go&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://gigaom.com/2014/04/21/here-comes-the-upshot-the-new-explanatory-journalism-effort-from-the-new-york-times/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Three good things about Ezra Klein&#8217;s new site Vox, plus three challenges that it faces</title>
		<link>https://gigaom.com/2014/04/07/three-good-things-about-ezra-kleins-new-site-vox-plus-three-challenges-that-it-faces/</link>
		<comments>https://gigaom.com/2014/04/07/three-good-things-about-ezra-kleins-new-site-vox-plus-three-challenges-that-it-faces/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2014 18:03:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mathew Ingram]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[journalism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=832636</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Vox, the new explanatory journalism site from former Washington Post blogger Ezra Klein, launched on Sunday and it does many things well -- including a design based on information "cards" that&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://gigaom.com/2014/04/07/three-good-things-about-ezra-kleins-new-site-vox-plus-three-challenges-that-it-faces/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Before the &#8220;explanatory journalism&#8221; craze started to catch fire, there was Syria Deeply</title>
		<link>https://gigaom.com/2014/03/24/before-the-explanatory-journalism-craze-started-to-catch-fire-there-was-syria-deeply/</link>
		<comments>https://gigaom.com/2014/03/24/before-the-explanatory-journalism-craze-started-to-catch-fire-there-was-syria-deeply/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2014 22:53:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mathew Ingram]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[journalism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=827645</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lara Setrakian, a former foreign correspondent for ABC News, started Syria Deeply because she believed that a news site focused on a specific topic would fill a need in the journalism&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://gigaom.com/2014/03/24/before-the-explanatory-journalism-craze-started-to-catch-fire-there-was-syria-deeply/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nate Silver&#8217;s new FiveThirtyEight site launches, but can his data-driven journalism find a market?</title>
		<link>https://gigaom.com/2014/03/17/nate-silvers-new-fivethirtyeight-site-launches-but-can-his-data-driven-journalism-find-a-market/</link>
		<comments>https://gigaom.com/2014/03/17/nate-silvers-new-fivethirtyeight-site-launches-but-can-his-data-driven-journalism-find-a-market/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2014 22:39:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mathew Ingram]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[journalism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=825660</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Former New York Times blogger Nate Silver launched his new data-driven site FiveThirtyEight on Monday morning, but can he find a broad enough -- and deep enough -- market for the&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://gigaom.com/2014/03/17/nate-silvers-new-fivethirtyeight-site-launches-but-can-his-data-driven-journalism-find-a-market/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why the rise of sites devoted to explanatory journalism is a trend worth celebrating</title>
		<link>https://gigaom.com/2014/02/28/why-the-rise-of-sites-devoted-to-explanatory-journalism-is-a-trend-worth-celebrating/</link>
		<comments>https://gigaom.com/2014/02/28/why-the-rise-of-sites-devoted-to-explanatory-journalism-is-a-trend-worth-celebrating/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2014 19:27:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mathew Ingram]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[journalism]]></category>
<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NYSE:TWTR]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NYSE:WPO]]></category>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=821376</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An increasing number of new-media startups -- and even new projects by existing media outlets -- are aimed at bringing context, background and analysis to the news instead of just trying&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://gigaom.com/2014/02/28/why-the-rise-of-sites-devoted-to-explanatory-journalism-is-a-trend-worth-celebrating/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Newspapers need better exits</title>
		<link>http://research.gigaom.com/2014/01/newspapers-need-better-exits/</link>
		<comments>http://research.gigaom.com/2014/01/newspapers-need-better-exits/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jan 2014 21:16:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Sweeting]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entrepreneurs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entrepreneurship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Startups]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[traditional news organizations]]></category>
<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NYSE:NYT]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NYSE:WPO]]></category>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://research.gigaom.com/?p=214704</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Incubating new digital news brands is exactly what traditional news organizations should be doing right now. But they need to treat them as genuine startups, with the expectation that they will&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://research.gigaom.com/2014/01/newspapers-need-better-exits/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>