<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
			xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
		>

<channel>
	<title>Gigaom Search &#187; data retention</title>
	<atom:link href="http://search.gigaom.com/tag/data-retention/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://search.gigaom.com</link>
	<description>Search and browse the archives</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2015 13:08:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>The curious case of Angela Merkel and her EU data retention ideas</title>
		<link>https://gigaom.com/2015/01/15/the-curious-case-of-angela-merkel-and-her-eu-data-retention-ideas/</link>
		<comments>https://gigaom.com/2015/01/15/the-curious-case-of-angela-merkel-and-her-eu-data-retention-ideas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2015 18:55:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Meyer]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Angela Merkel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cecilia Malmström]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data retention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dimitris Avramopoulos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet service providers (ISPs)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ISPs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mass surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Telcos]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=906919</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the wake of last week's terrorist attacks in Paris, German Chancellor Angela Merkel has called on the European Commission to deliver on its "promise" of a new EU-wide data retention&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://gigaom.com/2015/01/15/the-curious-case-of-angela-merkel-and-her-eu-data-retention-ideas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>EU legal advisers cast doubt on data retention legality</title>
		<link>https://gigaom.com/2015/01/09/eu-legal-advisers-cast-doubt-on-data-retention-legality/</link>
		<comments>https://gigaom.com/2015/01/09/eu-legal-advisers-cast-doubt-on-data-retention-legality/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2015 14:49:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Meyer]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data retention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data Retention Directive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mass surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=905338</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The European Parliament's legal advisors have issued a report into the repercussions of last year's ruling by the Court of Justice of the European Union, in which the CJEU struck down&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://gigaom.com/2015/01/09/eu-legal-advisers-cast-doubt-on-data-retention-legality/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Charlie Hebdo murders are no excuse for killing online freedom</title>
		<link>https://gigaom.com/2015/01/08/charlie-hebdo-murders-are-no-excuse-for-killing-online-freedom/</link>
		<comments>https://gigaom.com/2015/01/08/charlie-hebdo-murders-are-no-excuse-for-killing-online-freedom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2015 10:31:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Meyer]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data retention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lee Rigby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mass surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online civil liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the Telegraph]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=905072</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There's been a predictable split in the reactions to Wednesday's slaughter of the staff of French satirical newspaper Charlie Hebdo, along with others including police who were trying to protect them&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://gigaom.com/2015/01/08/charlie-hebdo-murders-are-no-excuse-for-killing-online-freedom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UK court to review legality of web snooping law</title>
		<link>https://gigaom.com/2014/12/08/uk-court-to-review-legality-of-web-snooping-law/</link>
		<comments>https://gigaom.com/2014/12/08/uk-court-to-review-legality-of-web-snooping-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2014 15:08:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Meyer]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data retention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Davis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Watson]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=898855</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two British members of Parliament have won the right to have the contentious Data Retention and Investigatory Powers Act (DRIPA) – an expansion of the U.K. authorities' surveillance powers – reviewed&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://gigaom.com/2014/12/08/uk-court-to-review-legality-of-web-snooping-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Swedish ISP protects customers from surveillance with free VPN</title>
		<link>https://gigaom.com/2014/11/17/swedish-isp-protects-customers-from-surveillance-with-free-vpn/</link>
		<comments>https://gigaom.com/2014/11/17/swedish-isp-protects-customers-from-surveillance-with-free-vpn/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2014 16:51:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Meyer]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data retention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet service providers (ISPs)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[isp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sweden]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=889443</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bahnhof was the last Swedish ISP to resist the enforcement of a data retention law that is arguably illegal under EU law. Now it's technically giving in, but it intends to&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://gigaom.com/2014/11/17/swedish-isp-protects-customers-from-surveillance-with-free-vpn/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Metadata collection comes under fire in new UN anti-surveillance draft resolution</title>
		<link>https://gigaom.com/2014/11/07/metadata-collection-comes-under-fire-in-new-un-anti-surveillance-draft-resolution/</link>
		<comments>https://gigaom.com/2014/11/07/metadata-collection-comes-under-fire-in-new-un-anti-surveillance-draft-resolution/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2014 09:07:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Meyer]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[communications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data retention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metadata]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surveillance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=887046</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The draft proposal would make data retention laws taboo. As with the earlier anti-surveillance resolution it builds upon, this one comes from Brazil and Germany.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://gigaom.com/2014/11/07/metadata-collection-comes-under-fire-in-new-un-anti-surveillance-draft-resolution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Swedish ISP Bahnhof threatened with fine for not storing customer data for law enforcement</title>
		<link>https://gigaom.com/2014/10/29/swedish-isp-bahnhof-threatened-with-fine-for-not-storing-customer-data-for-law-enforcement/</link>
		<comments>https://gigaom.com/2014/10/29/swedish-isp-bahnhof-threatened-with-fine-for-not-storing-customer-data-for-law-enforcement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2014 11:21:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Meyer]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data retention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sweden]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=884529</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bahnhof is the only Swedish ISP to still be holding out against a local data retention law that should arguably have been struck down following a major EU court ruling earlier&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://gigaom.com/2014/10/29/swedish-isp-bahnhof-threatened-with-fine-for-not-storing-customer-data-for-law-enforcement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Australian authorities don&#8217;t want to track web surfing, but they do want bandwidth data</title>
		<link>https://gigaom.com/2014/08/27/australian-authorities-dont-want-to-track-web-surfing-but-they-do-want-bandwidth-data/</link>
		<comments>https://gigaom.com/2014/08/27/australian-authorities-dont-want-to-track-web-surfing-but-they-do-want-bandwidth-data/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2014 09:09:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Meyer]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data retention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Brandis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet service providers (ISPs)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ISPs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surveillance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=868109</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A leaked consultation paper suggests that the Australian government has realised it's a tad excessive to track which websites people visit. However, the tracking of available bandwidth and upload/download information seems&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://gigaom.com/2014/08/27/australian-authorities-dont-want-to-track-web-surfing-but-they-do-want-bandwidth-data/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Australian government reveals mandatory data retention plans</title>
		<link>https://gigaom.com/2014/08/05/australian-government-reveals-mandatory-data-retention-plans/</link>
		<comments>https://gigaom.com/2014/08/05/australian-government-reveals-mandatory-data-retention-plans/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2014 09:52:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Meyer]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data retention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Telecommunications]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=862715</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Australia may follow the U.K. in forcing communications service providers to hang onto customers' data as an anti-terrorism measure.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://gigaom.com/2014/08/05/australian-government-reveals-mandatory-data-retention-plans/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UK scrambles to replace invalidated metadata retention laws</title>
		<link>https://gigaom.com/2014/07/07/uk-scrambles-to-replace-invalidated-metadata-retention-laws/</link>
		<comments>https://gigaom.com/2014/07/07/uk-scrambles-to-replace-invalidated-metadata-retention-laws/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2014 10:25:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Meyer]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data Protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data retention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Northern Ireland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Snooper's charter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surveillance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=855641</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the wake of Europe's top court invalidating the Data Retention Directive for having insufficient privacy safeguards, the British government is set to pass emergency laws allowing the core functions to&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://gigaom.com/2014/07/07/uk-scrambles-to-replace-invalidated-metadata-retention-laws/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
