<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
			xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
		>

<channel>
	<title>Gigaom Search &#187; DMCA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://search.gigaom.com/tag/dmca/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://search.gigaom.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2015 13:08:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Bad dentist must pay $4,677 in case over Yelp threats</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2015/03/03/bad-dentist-must-pay-4677-for-threats-over-yelp-review/</link>
		<comments>http://gigaom.com/2015/03/03/bad-dentist-must-pay-4677-for-threats-over-yelp-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2015 16:01:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Roberts]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DMCA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fair use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Citizen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stacey Makhnevich]]></category>
<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NYSE:YELP]]></category>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=918375</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's bad enough having a toothache. It's much worse when your dentist rips you off for $4,000 and then threatens to sue you for complaining about the treatment. That's what happened to New York&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://gigaom.com/2015/03/03/bad-dentist-must-pay-4677-for-threats-over-yelp-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google and Mississippi meet in court over secret MPAA lobbying</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2015/02/13/google-and-mississippi-meet-in-court-over-secret-mpaa-lobbying/</link>
		<comments>http://gigaom.com/2015/02/13/google-and-mississippi-meet-in-court-over-secret-mpaa-lobbying/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2015 15:31:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Roberts]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Attorney General Jim Hood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DMCA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google MPAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mississippi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 230]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sopa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA)]]></category>
<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NASDAQ:GOOG]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NSDQ:GOOG]]></category>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=914818</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A devastating hack on Sony late last year exposed embarrassing details about Hollywood's darker side, including a secret campaign by the movie industry to bring about new copyright controls. Dubbed "Project Goliath," the plan&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://gigaom.com/2015/02/13/google-and-mississippi-meet-in-court-over-secret-mpaa-lobbying/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Twitter and Etsy get high marks in report card on copyright and free speech</title>
		<link>https://gigaom.com/2014/10/28/twitter-and-etsy-get-high-marks-in-report-card-on-copyright-and-free-speech/</link>
		<comments>https://gigaom.com/2014/10/28/twitter-and-etsy-get-high-marks-in-report-card-on-copyright-and-free-speech/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2014 14:29:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Roberts]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DMCA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fair-use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intellectual property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parker Higgins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark]]></category>
<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NYSE:TWTR]]></category>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=884172</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When it comes to balancing creative rights on the internet, companies like Twitter and Pinterest play an important role as middlemen. How are they performing?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://gigaom.com/2014/10/28/twitter-and-etsy-get-high-marks-in-report-card-on-copyright-and-free-speech/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google imposes new penalty on pirate sites in search results</title>
		<link>https://gigaom.com/2014/10/17/google-imposes-new-penalty-on-pirate-sites-in-search-results/</link>
		<comments>https://gigaom.com/2014/10/17/google-imposes-new-penalty-on-pirate-sites-in-search-results/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2014 14:14:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Roberts]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adsense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright-infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital millennium copyright act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DMCA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[piracy]]></category>
<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NASDAQ:GOOG]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NSDQ:GOOG]]></category>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=881711</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google is demoting pirate sites further in its search rankings. That news is one nugget contained in a larger report that details the company's ongoing anti-piracy efforts.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://gigaom.com/2014/10/17/google-imposes-new-penalty-on-pirate-sites-in-search-results/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google threatened with $100M lawsuit over nude celebrity photos, but case appears weak</title>
		<link>https://gigaom.com/2014/10/02/google-threatened-with-100m-lawsuit-over-nude-celebrity-photos-but-case-appears-weak/</link>
		<comments>https://gigaom.com/2014/10/02/google-threatened-with-100m-lawsuit-over-nude-celebrity-photos-but-case-appears-weak/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2014 14:04:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Roberts]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[celebrity hacking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DMCA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[icloud hack]]></category>
<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NASDAQ:GOOG]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NSDQ:GOOG]]></category>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=877824</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is Google dodging its legal duties to remove nude celebrity images in order to make a buck? No, but Hollywood lawyers are threatening a $100 million suit anyways.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://gigaom.com/2014/10/02/google-threatened-with-100m-lawsuit-over-nude-celebrity-photos-but-case-appears-weak/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Victory against Grooveshark shows music industry has upper hand on sharing sites</title>
		<link>https://gigaom.com/2014/09/30/victory-against-grooveshark-shows-music-industry-has-upper-hand-on-sharing-sites/</link>
		<comments>https://gigaom.com/2014/09/30/victory-against-grooveshark-shows-music-industry-has-upper-hand-on-sharing-sites/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2014 15:33:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Roberts]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital licensing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DMCA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grooveshark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safe harbors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UMG]]></category>
<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NYSE:SNE]]></category>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=877125</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why are courts taking such a hardline against music-sharing sites? A judge's decision this week to throw the book at music-sharing site Grooveshark is just the latest example of how the&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://gigaom.com/2014/09/30/victory-against-grooveshark-shows-music-industry-has-upper-hand-on-sharing-sites/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WordPress shames Janet Jackson for bullying bloggers and issues a new takedown report</title>
		<link>https://gigaom.com/2014/09/08/wordpress-shames-janet-jackson-for-bullying-bloggers-and-issues-a-new-takedown-report/</link>
		<comments>https://gigaom.com/2014/09/08/wordpress-shames-janet-jackson-for-bullying-bloggers-and-issues-a-new-takedown-report/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2014 17:53:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Roberts]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DMCA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fair-use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Janet Jackson]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=871154</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Powerful celebrities and companies are bullying some of the millions of bloggers who use the popular WordPress platform with outlandish copyright claims. Wordpress just called attention to some of the worst&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://gigaom.com/2014/09/08/wordpress-shames-janet-jackson-for-bullying-bloggers-and-issues-a-new-takedown-report/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why 4Chan created a copyright shield in the wake of the Apple leak</title>
		<link>https://gigaom.com/2014/09/03/why-4chan-created-a-copyright-shield-in-the-wake-of-the-apple-leak/</link>
		<comments>https://gigaom.com/2014/09/03/why-4chan-created-a-copyright-shield-in-the-wake-of-the-apple-leak/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2014 19:13:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Roberts]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple icloud hacks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital millennium copyright act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DMCA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hacking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=869863</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the sites at the center of the nude photography scandal just put in place DMCA measures that shield websites from copyright liability. Here's the likely explanation of why it&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://gigaom.com/2014/09/03/why-4chan-created-a-copyright-shield-in-the-wake-of-the-apple-leak/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Germany considers &#8220;cyber courts&#8221; for judging which Google links should be nixed</title>
		<link>https://gigaom.com/2014/05/27/germany-considers-cyber-courts-for-judging-which-google-links-should-be-nixed/</link>
		<comments>https://gigaom.com/2014/05/27/germany-considers-cyber-courts-for-judging-which-google-links-should-be-nixed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2014 17:18:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Meyer]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DMCA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[takedown]]></category>
<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NSDQ:GOOG]]></category>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=844631</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The system is one of several options being weighed by Germany after this month's seismic European ruling about the removal of unwelcome information from search results. It sounds ominous, but it&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://gigaom.com/2014/05/27/germany-considers-cyber-courts-for-judging-which-google-links-should-be-nixed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Copyright &#8220;safe harbors&#8221; shrink in wake of MP3Tunes, other red flag rulings</title>
		<link>https://gigaom.com/2014/03/21/copyright-safe-harbors-shrink-in-wake-of-mp3tunes-other-red-flag-rulings/</link>
		<comments>https://gigaom.com/2014/03/21/copyright-safe-harbors-shrink-in-wake-of-mp3tunes-other-red-flag-rulings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2014 18:11:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Roberts]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright-infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DMCA]]></category>
<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NSDQ:GOOG]]></category>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=826951</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The CEO of a defunct music site is in trouble after a jury ruled he should have known about copyrighted songs on the site. The verdict is partly the result of&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://gigaom.com/2014/03/21/copyright-safe-harbors-shrink-in-wake-of-mp3tunes-other-red-flag-rulings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>