<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
			xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
		>

<channel>
	<title>Gigaom Search &#187; federal circuit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://search.gigaom.com/tag/federal-circuit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://search.gigaom.com</link>
	<description>Search and browse the archives</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2015 13:08:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Supreme Court strips more power from controversial patent court</title>
		<link>https://gigaom.com/2015/01/20/supreme-court-strips-more-power-from-controversial-patent-court/</link>
		<comments>https://gigaom.com/2015/01/20/supreme-court-strips-more-power-from-controversial-patent-court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2015 17:26:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Roberts]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[claim construction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice Alex Kozinski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Posner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandoz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[standard of review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Breyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Teva pharmaceuticals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Teva Pharmaceuticals v Sandoz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Teva v Sandoz]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=907845</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Supreme Court issued a ruling Tuesday that will have a significant impact on the patent system by limiting the ability of the Federal Circuit, a specialized court that hears patent appeals, to&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://gigaom.com/2015/01/20/supreme-court-strips-more-power-from-controversial-patent-court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Court finally kills infamous patent for watching ads online</title>
		<link>https://gigaom.com/2014/11/14/court-finally-kills-infamous-patent-for-watching-ads-online/</link>
		<comments>https://gigaom.com/2014/11/14/court-finally-kills-infamous-patent-for-watching-ads-online/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2014 18:12:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Roberts]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online-video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pre-roll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ultramercial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wildtangent]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=889071</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A company called Ultramercial has for years claimed that a monopoly over an "invention" for showing pre-roll ads on the internet, and sued the likes of Hulu and YouTube for royalty&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://gigaom.com/2014/11/14/court-finally-kills-infamous-patent-for-watching-ads-online/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Computer experts push Supreme Court to hear Google&#8217;s appeal in API copyright case</title>
		<link>https://gigaom.com/2014/11/10/computer-experts-push-supreme-court-to-hear-googles-appeal-in-api-copyright-case/</link>
		<comments>https://gigaom.com/2014/11/10/computer-experts-push-supreme-court-to-hear-googles-appeal-in-api-copyright-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2014 14:39:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Roberts]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal circuit]]></category>
<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NASDAQ:GOOG]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NASDAQ:ORCL]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NSDQ:GOOG]]></category>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=887494</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Can companies like Oracle exert copyright over basic software instructions? A new petition from leading computer scientists makes it more likely the Supreme Court will hear an appeal of a decision&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://gigaom.com/2014/11/10/computer-experts-push-supreme-court-to-hear-googles-appeal-in-api-copyright-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google urges Supreme Court to act on Oracle ruling, shut down copyright claims on APIs</title>
		<link>https://gigaom.com/2014/10/09/google-urges-supreme-court-to-act-on-oracle-ruling-shut-down-copyright-claims-on-apis/</link>
		<comments>https://gigaom.com/2014/10/09/google-urges-supreme-court-to-act-on-oracle-ruling-shut-down-copyright-claims-on-apis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2014 19:33:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Roberts]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal circuit]]></category>
<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NASDAQ:GOOG]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NASDAQ:ORCL]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NSDQ:GOOG]]></category>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=879658</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Unless the Supreme Court steps in, companies like Oracle are set to own small pieces of code that are the basic building blocks used by developers in all sorts of technology&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://gigaom.com/2014/10/09/google-urges-supreme-court-to-act-on-oracle-ruling-shut-down-copyright-claims-on-apis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>After a key Supreme Court decision this summer, courts are shredding software patents and trolls</title>
		<link>https://gigaom.com/2014/09/12/after-a-key-supreme-court-decision-this-summer-courts-are-shredding-software-patents-and-trolls/</link>
		<comments>https://gigaom.com/2014/09/12/after-a-key-supreme-court-decision-this-summer-courts-are-shredding-software-patents-and-trolls/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2014 17:59:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Roberts]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent trolls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patentable subject matter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 101]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software patents]]></category>
<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NASDAQ:GOOG]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NASDAQ:MSFT]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NSDQ:AMZN]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NSDQ:GOOG]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NSDQ:MSFT]]></category>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=872714</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Patent reform failed in Congress this year but a spec of hope has arrived in the form of a spate of court decisions in which courts are deciding that so-called inventions&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://gigaom.com/2014/09/12/after-a-key-supreme-court-decision-this-summer-courts-are-shredding-software-patents-and-trolls/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ethics fail by top judge gives Congress new reason to close patent court</title>
		<link>https://gigaom.com/2014/05/23/ethics-fail-by-top-judge-gives-congress-new-reason-to-close-patent-court/</link>
		<comments>https://gigaom.com/2014/05/23/ethics-fail-by-top-judge-gives-congress-new-reason-to-close-patent-court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2014 15:36:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Roberts]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Randall Rader]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=844151</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The appeals court responsible for America's troubled patent system already has a poor reputation. News that its top judge is endorsing lawyers won't improve that. The controversy suggests it's time to&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://gigaom.com/2014/05/23/ethics-fail-by-top-judge-gives-congress-new-reason-to-close-patent-court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pre-roll ads can be patented: appeals court rules in Hulu case</title>
		<link>https://gigaom.com/2013/06/21/pre-roll-ads-can-be-patented-appeals-court-rules-in-hulu-case/</link>
		<comments>https://gigaom.com/2013/06/21/pre-roll-ads-can-be-patented-appeals-court-rules-in-hulu-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2013 18:03:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Roberts]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abstract]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online-advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ultramercial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video advertising]]></category>
<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NASDAQ:GOOG]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NSDQ:GOOG]]></category>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=660228</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Opponents of software patents suffered a setback as the Federal Circuit today said a patent for displaying content before a video should not be considered an abstract idea.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://gigaom.com/2013/06/21/pre-roll-ads-can-be-patented-appeals-court-rules-in-hulu-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Media outlets will argue in Apple, Samsung appeal over sealed documents</title>
		<link>https://gigaom.com/2013/03/15/media-outlets-will-argue-in-apple-samsung-appeal-over-sealed-documents/</link>
		<comments>https://gigaom.com/2013/03/15/media-outlets-will-argue-in-apple-samsung-appeal-over-sealed-documents/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 21:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Roberts]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment Coalition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[press freedom]]></category>
<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NASDAQ:AAPL]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NSDQ:AAPL]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NYSE:NYT]]></category>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=621219</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last years' gigantic court fight between Apple and Samsung continues to have ripples in the court and the press. This week, an appeals court agreed to let the New York Times&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://gigaom.com/2013/03/15/media-outlets-will-argue-in-apple-samsung-appeal-over-sealed-documents/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Another senior judge bemoans &#8216;wasteful litigation,&#8217; state of patent system</title>
		<link>https://gigaom.com/2012/08/16/another-senior-judge-bemoans-wasteful-litigation-state-of-patent-system/</link>
		<comments>https://gigaom.com/2012/08/16/another-senior-judge-bemoans-wasteful-litigation-state-of-patent-system/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2012 21:07:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Roberts]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bodem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judge dyk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent troll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent trolls]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=553840</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A judge added more grist to the ongoing controversy over the state of America's patent system. The judge -- who sits on the country's top patent court -- complained about the&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://gigaom.com/2012/08/16/another-senior-judge-bemoans-wasteful-litigation-state-of-patent-system/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>