<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
			xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
		>

<channel>
	<title>Gigaom Search &#187; federal court</title>
	<atom:link href="http://search.gigaom.com/tag/federal-court/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://search.gigaom.com</link>
	<description>Search and browse the archives</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2015 13:08:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Apple monitor under fire for $2.6M bill, &#8220;roving inquisition&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2015/02/17/apple-monitor-under-fire-for-2-6m-bill-roving-inquisition/</link>
		<comments>http://gigaom.com/2015/02/17/apple-monitor-under-fire-for-2-6m-bill-roving-inquisition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2015 19:57:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Roberts]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antitrust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judge denise cote]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Bromwich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York federal court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[second circuit]]></category>
<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NASDAQ:AAPL]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NSDQ:AAPL]]></category>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=915271</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The lawyer overseeing an Apple antitrust order is a political hack who has run roughshod over the judicial process during ten visits to the company's Cupertino headquarters, a Wall Street Journal editorial charged Tuesday, and&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://gigaom.com/2015/02/17/apple-monitor-under-fire-for-2-6m-bill-roving-inquisition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ryan Seacrest&#8217;s Typo sold thousands of BlackBerry-style keyboards in defiance of court order, faces contempt charge</title>
		<link>https://gigaom.com/2014/08/22/ryan-seacrests-typo-sold-thousands-of-blackberry-style-keyboards-in-defiance-of-court-order-faces-contempt-charge/</link>
		<comments>https://gigaom.com/2014/08/22/ryan-seacrests-typo-sold-thousands-of-blackberry-style-keyboards-in-defiance-of-court-order-faces-contempt-charge/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2014 17:38:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Roberts]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer electronics manufacturers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge William Orrick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[temporary injunction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Typo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Typo 2]]></category>
<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NASDAQ:AAPL]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NSDQ:AAPL]]></category>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=867119</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A judge ordered Typo to stop selling a keyboard for iPhone because the product appeared to violate BlackBerry's patents. Ryan Seacrest's company kept selling them anyways, a court order shows.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://gigaom.com/2014/08/22/ryan-seacrests-typo-sold-thousands-of-blackberry-style-keyboards-in-defiance-of-court-order-faces-contempt-charge/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Samsung and its lawyers must pay $2M to Apple and Nokia over leaked patent document</title>
		<link>https://gigaom.com/2014/06/24/samsung-and-its-lawyers-must-pay-2m-to-apple-and-nokia-over-leaked-patent-document/</link>
		<comments>https://gigaom.com/2014/06/24/samsung-and-its-lawyers-must-pay-2m-to-apple-and-nokia-over-leaked-patent-document/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2014 16:11:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Roberts]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer electronics manufacturers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Paul Grewal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quinn emanuel]]></category>
<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NASDAQ:AAPL]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NSDQ:AAPL]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NYSE:NOK]]></category>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=852774</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Samsung and its outside law firm will have to pay for an embarrassing incident involving lawyers who disclosed a confidential document.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://gigaom.com/2014/06/24/samsung-and-its-lawyers-must-pay-2m-to-apple-and-nokia-over-leaked-patent-document/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple seeks new trial and sales ban in never-ending patent fight with Samsung</title>
		<link>https://gigaom.com/2014/05/27/apple-seeks-new-trial-and-sales-ban-in-never-ending-patent-fight-with-samsung/</link>
		<comments>https://gigaom.com/2014/05/27/apple-seeks-new-trial-and-sales-ban-in-never-ending-patent-fight-with-samsung/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2014 13:02:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Roberts]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer electronics manufacturers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judge lucy koh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphone patents]]></category>
<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NASDAQ:AAPL]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NSDQ:AAPL]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NSDQ:GOOG]]></category>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=844528</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apple is taking steps to end some of its long-running patent battles -- but not with Samsung. It asked a San Jose judge for a recount on a jury award and&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://gigaom.com/2014/05/27/apple-seeks-new-trial-and-sales-ban-in-never-ending-patent-fight-with-samsung/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Appeals court has harsh words for Apple and DOJ in fight over antitrust monitor</title>
		<link>https://gigaom.com/2014/02/04/appeals-court-has-harsh-words-for-apple-and-justice-dept-in-fight-over-anti-trust-monitor/</link>
		<comments>https://gigaom.com/2014/02/04/appeals-court-has-harsh-words-for-apple-and-justice-dept-in-fight-over-anti-trust-monitor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2014 17:48:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Roberts]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antitrust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice Pierre Leval]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Bromwich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[second circuit]]></category>
<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NASDAQ:AAPL]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NSDQ:AAPL]]></category>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=813741</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apple is fighting a court order that imposes a monitor to investigate the company -- at Apple's expense. On Tuesday, Apple and the Justice Department sparred over whether the monitor should&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://gigaom.com/2014/02/04/appeals-court-has-harsh-words-for-apple-and-justice-dept-in-fight-over-anti-trust-monitor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Feds accuse Apple of &#8220;character assassination&#8221; over antitrust monitor &#8211; UPDATE</title>
		<link>https://gigaom.com/2014/01/13/feds-accuse-apple-of-character-assassination-in-fight-over-antitrust-monitor/</link>
		<comments>https://gigaom.com/2014/01/13/feds-accuse-apple-of-character-assassination-in-fight-over-antitrust-monitor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jan 2014 19:29:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Roberts]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antitrust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judge denise cote]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Bromwich]]></category>
<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NASDAQ:AAPL]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NSDQ:AAPL]]></category>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=791414</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The fight between Apple and the Justice Department over the behavior of court monitor Michael Bromwich is getting more catty every week. After Apple called for his removal, the government shot&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://gigaom.com/2014/01/13/feds-accuse-apple-of-character-assassination-in-fight-over-antitrust-monitor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How feds use one &#8220;seed&#8221; and 3 &#8220;hops&#8221; to spy on nearly everyone</title>
		<link>https://gigaom.com/2013/12/17/how-feds-use-one-seed-and-3-hops-to-spy-on-nearly-everyone/</link>
		<comments>https://gigaom.com/2013/12/17/how-feds-use-one-seed-and-3-hops-to-spy-on-nearly-everyone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Dec 2013 20:44:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Roberts]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NSA call database]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NSA electronic surveillance program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phone surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Leon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surveillance]]></category>
<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NYSE:VZ]]></category>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=779987</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The government's claim that it "minimizes" spies' access to a giant phone database is laughable in light of an important new court ruling that cites Domino's Pizza and the Beatles to&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://gigaom.com/2013/12/17/how-feds-use-one-seed-and-3-hops-to-spy-on-nearly-everyone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Judge says bank can&#8217;t use Facebook to reach defendant &#8212; try local paper instead</title>
		<link>https://gigaom.com/2012/06/12/judge-says-bank-cant-use-facebook-to-reach-defendant-try-local-paper-instead/</link>
		<comments>https://gigaom.com/2012/06/12/judge-says-bank-cant-use-facebook-to-reach-defendant-try-local-paper-instead/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2012 21:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Roberts]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge John Keenan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law and media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[service]]></category>
<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NASDAQ:FB]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NSDQ:FB]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NYSE:TWTR]]></category>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.org/?p=211317</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the latest example of the justice system's ongoing discomfort with social media, a federal judge has refused a request by Chase Bank to use Facebook (s FB) to serve legal&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://gigaom.com/2012/06/12/judge-says-bank-cant-use-facebook-to-reach-defendant-try-local-paper-instead/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ron Paul Fails Again To Identify YouTube, Twitter Impostors</title>
		<link>https://gigaom.com/2012/03/09/419-ron-paul-fails-again-to-identify-youtube-twitter-impostors/</link>
		<comments>https://gigaom.com/2012/03/09/419-ron-paul-fails-again-to-identify-youtube-twitter-impostors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2012 03:08:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Roberts]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[john does]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nhliberty4paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ron paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark]]></category>
<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NASDAQ:GOOG]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NSDQ:GOOG]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NYSE:TWTR]]></category>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gostage.paidcontent.org/419-ron-paul-fails-again-to-identify-youtube-twitter-impostors/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A judge has once again rebuffed Republican Presidential candidate Ron Paul's efforts to unmask the people who used his name to launch racist&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://gigaom.com/2012/03/09/419-ron-paul-fails-again-to-identify-youtube-twitter-impostors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>