<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
			xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
		>

<channel>
	<title>Gigaom Search &#187; first amendment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://search.gigaom.com/tag/first-amendment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://search.gigaom.com</link>
	<description>Search and browse the archives</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2015 13:08:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Tech and media firms join Twitter in key test of FBI gag orders</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2015/02/18/tech-and-media-firms-join-twitter-in-key-test-of-fbi-gag-orders/</link>
		<comments>http://gigaom.com/2015/02/18/tech-and-media-firms-join-twitter-in-key-test-of-fbi-gag-orders/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2015 16:07:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Roberts]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[first amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Look Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national security letter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Security letters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patriot Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surveillance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=915474</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A bitter fight between the Justice Department and Silicon Valley is expanding as a diverse group of companies have lined up behind Twitter in a case that will help determine the limits of free speech&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://gigaom.com/2015/02/18/tech-and-media-firms-join-twitter-in-key-test-of-fbi-gag-orders/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook threats and the Supreme Court: a guide to today&#8217;s case</title>
		<link>https://gigaom.com/2014/12/01/facebook-threats-and-the-supreme-court-a-guide-to-todays-case/</link>
		<comments>https://gigaom.com/2014/12/01/facebook-threats-and-the-supreme-court-a-guide-to-todays-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2014 11:01:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Roberts]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elonis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[first amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[threats]]></category>
<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NASDAQ:FB]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NSDQ:FB]]></category>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=897067</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Supreme Court on Monday will hear the appeal of a man who went to prison for posting violent rants on Facebook. The case will shape the future of what people&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://gigaom.com/2014/12/01/facebook-threats-and-the-supreme-court-a-guide-to-todays-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Board says FAA has power over drones, can impose $10K fine</title>
		<link>https://gigaom.com/2014/11/18/board-says-faa-has-power-over-drones-can-impose-10k-fine/</link>
		<comments>https://gigaom.com/2014/11/18/board-says-faa-has-power-over-drones-can-impose-10k-fine/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2014 16:46:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Roberts]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[first amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mickey Osterreicher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Press Photographers Association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Transportation Safety Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Raphael Pirker]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=889816</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a setback for consumer drone advocates, the National Transportation Safety Board on Tuesday supported the FAA's authority to impose a $10,000 fine on Raphael Pirker, a photographer who had taken&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://gigaom.com/2014/11/18/board-says-faa-has-power-over-drones-can-impose-10k-fine/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google has free speech right in search results, court confirms</title>
		<link>https://gigaom.com/2014/11/17/google-has-free-speech-right-in-search-results-court-confirms/</link>
		<comments>https://gigaom.com/2014/11/17/google-has-free-speech-right-in-search-results-court-confirms/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2014 18:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Roberts]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antitrust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CoastNews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[first amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slapp]]></category>
<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NASDAQ:GOOG]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NASDAQ:YHOO]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NSDQ:GOOG]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NSDQ:YHOO]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NYSE:YELP]]></category>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=889411</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A San Francisco court ruled last week that Google has the right to arrange its search results as it pleases, which confirms the company's long-held view, while underscoring the stark difference in how U.S. and European seek to regulate&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://gigaom.com/2014/11/17/google-has-free-speech-right-in-search-results-court-confirms/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fake news sites spread ebola hysteria: is there a way to stop them?</title>
		<link>https://gigaom.com/2014/10/27/fake-news-sites-spread-ebola-hysteria-is-there-a-way-to-stop-them/</link>
		<comments>https://gigaom.com/2014/10/27/fake-news-sites-spread-ebola-hysteria-is-there-a-way-to-stop-them/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2014 23:08:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Roberts]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fake news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[first amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ken Paulson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Report]]></category>
<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NASDAQ:FB]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NSDQ:FB]]></category>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=884025</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Viral "news" sites are exploiting Facebook and other social media channels to make a buck off the ebola scare, but, for now, there appears to be no practical options to stop&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://gigaom.com/2014/10/27/fake-news-sites-spread-ebola-hysteria-is-there-a-way-to-stop-them/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are &#8220;warrant canaries&#8221; legal? Twitter wants to save tech&#8217;s warning signal of government spying</title>
		<link>https://gigaom.com/2014/10/10/are-warrant-canaries-legal-twitter-wants-to-save-techs-warning-signal-of-government-spying/</link>
		<comments>https://gigaom.com/2014/10/10/are-warrant-canaries-legal-twitter-wants-to-save-techs-warning-signal-of-government-spying/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2014 18:32:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Roberts]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[first amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NSL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patriot Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transparency report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[warrant canary]]></category>
<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NASDAQ:AAPL]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NASDAQ:FB]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NASDAQ:GOOG]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NASDAQ:MSFT]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NSDQ:AAPL]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NSDQ:FB]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NSDQ:GOOG]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NSDQ:MSFT]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NSDQ:YHOO]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NYSE:LNKD]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NYSE:TWTR]]></category>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=880001</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Warrant canaries -- which tech companies are using to tell people that the government is NOT using secret orders -- are the new frontline in the legal fight over surveillance.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://gigaom.com/2014/10/10/are-warrant-canaries-legal-twitter-wants-to-save-techs-warning-signal-of-government-spying/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Zealand&#8217;s highest court: Anyone can be a journalist, and that includes bloggers</title>
		<link>https://gigaom.com/2014/09/18/new-zealands-highest-court-joins-growing-consensus-anyone-can-be-a-journalist-and-that-includes-bloggers/</link>
		<comments>https://gigaom.com/2014/09/18/new-zealands-highest-court-joins-growing-consensus-anyone-can-be-a-journalist-and-that-includes-bloggers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2014 16:18:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mathew Ingram]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bloggers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[first amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom of the press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=874224</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New Zealand's highest court has ruled that a blogger was engaged in journalism, and therefore is entitled to certain protections afforded to journalists, even though he was not affiliated with a&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://gigaom.com/2014/09/18/new-zealands-highest-court-joins-growing-consensus-anyone-can-be-a-journalist-and-that-includes-bloggers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>As tech firms take on the role of newsrooms, will they care about legal fights for public interest?</title>
		<link>https://gigaom.com/2014/09/14/tech-firms-take-on-role-of-news-rooms-but-sometimes-flinch-from-fighting-for-public-interest/</link>
		<comments>https://gigaom.com/2014/09/14/tech-firms-take-on-role-of-news-rooms-but-sometimes-flinch-from-fighting-for-public-interest/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2014 15:00:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Roberts]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adam Liptak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[first amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free expression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ken Paulson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tech and media]]></category>
<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NASDAQ:FB]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NSDQ:FB]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NSDQ:GOOG]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NYSE:TWTR]]></category>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=872944</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As the legal budgets of traditional news rooms keep shrinking, they have been unable to fight the public interest battles of the past. Will tech companies be willing or able to&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://gigaom.com/2014/09/14/tech-firms-take-on-role-of-news-rooms-but-sometimes-flinch-from-fighting-for-public-interest/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>You can use your phone to film the police, even if they tell you not to</title>
		<link>https://gigaom.com/2014/08/14/you-can-use-your-phone-to-film-the-police-even-if-they-tell-you-not-to/</link>
		<comments>https://gigaom.com/2014/08/14/you-can-use-your-phone-to-film-the-police-even-if-they-tell-you-not-to/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2014 13:47:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Roberts]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[berkman center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eugene Volokh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ferguson missouri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[first amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heritage Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[police brutality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[record police]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=865064</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Police in Ferguson reportedly told protesters to turn off their cameras. The law is clear they have no right to do so. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://gigaom.com/2014/08/14/you-can-use-your-phone-to-film-the-police-even-if-they-tell-you-not-to/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft wins right to disclose FBI&#8217;s demand for info about Office 365 customer</title>
		<link>https://gigaom.com/2014/05/22/microsoft-wins-right-to-disclose-fbis-demand-for-info-about-office-365-customer/</link>
		<comments>https://gigaom.com/2014/05/22/microsoft-wins-right-to-disclose-fbis-demand-for-info-about-office-365-customer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2014 20:13:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Roberts]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[first amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national security letter]]></category>
<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NASDAQ:MSFT]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NSDQ:MSFT]]></category>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=843952</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Microsoft won the right to unseal documents in a case over an enterprise customer; the ruling is a major legal victory against the federal government's blanket use of gag orders in&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://gigaom.com/2014/05/22/microsoft-wins-right-to-disclose-fbis-demand-for-info-about-office-365-customer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>