<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
			xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
		>

<channel>
	<title>Gigaom Search &#187; fourth amendment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://search.gigaom.com/tag/fourth-amendment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://search.gigaom.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2015 13:08:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Police can search cell phones without warrant, Canada rules</title>
		<link>https://gigaom.com/2014/12/11/police-can-search-cell-phones-without-warrant-canada-rules/</link>
		<comments>https://gigaom.com/2014/12/11/police-can-search-cell-phones-without-warrant-canada-rules/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2014 17:16:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Roberts]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cell phone searches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fourth amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Geist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[R. v Fearon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 8 Charter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court of canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wurie]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=899911</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Police in Canada don't need a judge's permission to search a suspect's cell phone so long as they follow certain steps, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled on Thursday in a split decision&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://gigaom.com/2014/12/11/police-can-search-cell-phones-without-warrant-canada-rules/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Suspect must use finger to unlock phone, as debate shifts over device privacy</title>
		<link>https://gigaom.com/2014/11/04/suspect-must-use-finger-to-unlock-phone-as-debate-shifts-over-device-privacy/</link>
		<comments>https://gigaom.com/2014/11/04/suspect-must-use-finger-to-unlock-phone-as-debate-shifts-over-device-privacy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2014 19:38:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Roberts]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cell phone searches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fifth Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fourth amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Orin Kerr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[touch-unlocking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wurie]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=886118</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Supreme Court's ruling this summer over cell phone warrants may have been the beginning, not the end, of the debate over police power to access our devices -- as a&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://gigaom.com/2014/11/04/suspect-must-use-finger-to-unlock-phone-as-debate-shifts-over-device-privacy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook and tech industry can appeal &#8220;bulk search warrant&#8221; ruling in key test of online privacy rights</title>
		<link>https://gigaom.com/2014/09/26/facebook-and-tech-industry-can-appeal-bulk-search-warrant-ruling-in-key-test-of-online-privacy-rights/</link>
		<comments>https://gigaom.com/2014/09/26/facebook-and-tech-industry-can-appeal-bulk-search-warrant-ruling-in-key-test-of-online-privacy-rights/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2014 21:42:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Roberts]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bulk search warrants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fourth amendment]]></category>
<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NASDAQ:FB]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NASDAQ:MSFT]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NSDQ:FB]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NSDQ:GOOG]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NSDQ:MSFT]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NYSE:TWTR]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NYSE:YELP]]></category>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=876450</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Facebook had to turn over account information about 381 people at once this summer as a result of a "bulk search warrant" process the company says is illegal. Now, a higher&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://gigaom.com/2014/09/26/facebook-and-tech-industry-can-appeal-bulk-search-warrant-ruling-in-key-test-of-online-privacy-rights/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Using strong crypto, TunnelX offers a conversation tool that no one can snoop on</title>
		<link>https://gigaom.com/2014/07/15/using-strong-crypto-tunnelx-offers-a-conversation-tool-that-no-one-can-snoop-on/</link>
		<comments>https://gigaom.com/2014/07/15/using-strong-crypto-tunnelx-offers-a-conversation-tool-that-no-one-can-snoop-on/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2014 15:31:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Roberts]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4th amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blackphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric Liftin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fourth amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ian Samuel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Laurence Tribe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Silent Circle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TunnelX]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=856693</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[TunnelX is a service that uses really strong encryption to let ordinary people have a truly private conversation online. But what will happen if the government comes calling?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://gigaom.com/2014/07/15/using-strong-crypto-tunnelx-offers-a-conversation-tool-that-no-one-can-snoop-on/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple, Cisco, AT&amp;T join Microsoft in fight against global search warrant</title>
		<link>https://gigaom.com/2014/06/15/apple-cisco-att-join-microsoft-in-fight-against-global-search-warrant/</link>
		<comments>https://gigaom.com/2014/06/15/apple-cisco-att-join-microsoft-in-fight-against-global-search-warrant/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2014 16:52:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Derrick Harris]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4th amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer electronics manufacturers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electronic Communications Privacy Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fourth amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stored communication act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Structure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Structure 2014]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surveillance]]></category>
<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NASDAQ:AAPL]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NASDAQ:MSFT]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NSDQ:AAPL]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NSDQ:CSCO]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NSDQ:MSFT]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NYSE:VZ]]></category>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=849973</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apple, Cisco and AT&#38;T have joined Verizon and the Electronic Frontier Foundation in supporting Microsoft's attempt to quash a U.S. search warrant seeking email data about an Irish customer stored on&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://gigaom.com/2014/06/15/apple-cisco-att-join-microsoft-in-fight-against-global-search-warrant/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In major privacy ruling, court says police need warrant to track phone users&#8217; location</title>
		<link>https://gigaom.com/2014/06/11/in-major-privacy-ruling-court-says-police-need-warrant-to-track-phone-users-location/</link>
		<comments>https://gigaom.com/2014/06/11/in-major-privacy-ruling-court-says-police-need-warrant-to-track-phone-users-location/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2014 22:12:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Roberts]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[11th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appeals court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fourth amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search and seizure]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=849082</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The 11th Circuit issued a decision on Wednesday that found police need a warrant to get data from phone companies that shows users' locations based on cell towers.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://gigaom.com/2014/06/11/in-major-privacy-ruling-court-says-police-need-warrant-to-track-phone-users-location/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Judge denies Gmail search warrant, notes &#8220;Technorati are &#8230; everywhere&#8221;</title>
		<link>https://gigaom.com/2014/05/12/judge-denies-gmail-search-warrant-notes-technorati-are-everywhere/</link>
		<comments>https://gigaom.com/2014/05/12/judge-denies-gmail-search-warrant-notes-technorati-are-everywhere/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2014 00:20:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Roberts]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fourth amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search warrant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Magistrate Judge Paul Grewal]]></category>
<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NSDQ:GOOG]]></category>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=841102</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A California judge is the latest to join the so-called "Magistrate's rebellion" -- in which lower-level judges are refusing to simply let the government grab all of someone's Google or Apple&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://gigaom.com/2014/05/12/judge-denies-gmail-search-warrant-notes-technorati-are-everywhere/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cell phone searches at the Supreme Court: a guide to today&#8217;s big privacy case (and where to learn more)</title>
		<link>https://gigaom.com/2014/04/29/cell-phone-searches-at-the-supreme-court-a-guide-to-todays-big-privacy-case-and-where-to-learn-more/</link>
		<comments>https://gigaom.com/2014/04/29/cell-phone-searches-at-the-supreme-court-a-guide-to-todays-big-privacy-case-and-where-to-learn-more/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2014 10:01:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Roberts]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[fourth amendment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=838003</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When can police go through a person's cellphone? The Supreme Court will hear two cases on Tuesday that will shape the future of privacy and police procedure.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://gigaom.com/2014/04/29/cell-phone-searches-at-the-supreme-court-a-guide-to-todays-big-privacy-case-and-where-to-learn-more/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court to rule on when cops can search your cell phone</title>
		<link>https://gigaom.com/2014/01/17/supreme-court-to-rule-on-when-cops-can-search-your-cell-phone/</link>
		<comments>https://gigaom.com/2014/01/17/supreme-court-to-rule-on-when-cops-can-search-your-cell-phone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jan 2014 20:48:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Roberts]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cell phone search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fourth amendment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=796013</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Right now, police can go through the cell phone of someone they've arrested in some states but not others. The Supreme Court accepted two cases which could clear what sort of&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://gigaom.com/2014/01/17/supreme-court-to-rule-on-when-cops-can-search-your-cell-phone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ACLU appeals ruling that NSA phone database is lawful</title>
		<link>https://gigaom.com/2014/01/02/aclu-appeals-ruling-that-nsa-phone-database-is-lawful/</link>
		<comments>https://gigaom.com/2014/01/02/aclu-appeals-ruling-that-nsa-phone-database-is-lawful/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jan 2014 21:35:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Roberts]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fourth amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telephony metadata]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[William Pauley III]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=788692</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Courts disagree about the legal status of a massive NSA database of American phone records. A new appeal could speed the issue towards the Supreme Court.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://gigaom.com/2014/01/02/aclu-appeals-ruling-that-nsa-phone-database-is-lawful/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>