<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
			xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
		>

<channel>
	<title>Gigaom Search &#187; House of Lords</title>
	<atom:link href="http://search.gigaom.com/tag/house-of-lords/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://search.gigaom.com</link>
	<description>Search and browse the archives</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2015 13:08:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Personal drone registration will become necessary, U.K. Lords say</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2015/03/05/personal-drone-registration-will-become-necessary-u-k-lords-advise/</link>
		<comments>http://gigaom.com/2015/03/05/personal-drone-registration-will-become-necessary-u-k-lords-advise/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2015 15:34:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Meyer]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House of Lords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[registration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RPAS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=919078</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A U.K House of Lords committee has recommended that, in the long term, people operating drones for leisure may need to register them so their owners can be traced. The House's&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://gigaom.com/2015/03/05/personal-drone-registration-will-become-necessary-u-k-lords-advise/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Zombie UK surveillance law re-buried for billionth time</title>
		<link>https://gigaom.com/2015/02/02/zombie-uk-surveillance-law-re-buried-for-billionth-time/</link>
		<comments>https://gigaom.com/2015/02/02/zombie-uk-surveillance-law-re-buried-for-billionth-time/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2015 18:56:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Meyer]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Communications Data Bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House of Lords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lord King]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surveillance]]></category>
<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NASDAQ:FB]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NSDQ:FB]]></category>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=911760</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Having tried to insert the wording of the rejected Communications Data Bill into new U.K. anti-terror legislation, then having withdrawn the amendment before reintroducing it days later, securocrat members of the&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://gigaom.com/2015/02/02/zombie-uk-surveillance-law-re-buried-for-billionth-time/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UK Lords kill attempt to sneak in new surveillance laws</title>
		<link>https://gigaom.com/2015/01/26/uk-lords-kill-attempt-to-sneak-in-new-surveillance-laws/</link>
		<comments>https://gigaom.com/2015/01/26/uk-lords-kill-attempt-to-sneak-in-new-surveillance-laws/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2015 19:52:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Meyer]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House of Lords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Snooper's charter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surveillance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=909795</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Members of the U.K. House of Lords, who last week introduced amendments to an antiterror bill that would have essentially brought back defeated surveillance legislation, have withdrawn the amendments after a&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://gigaom.com/2015/01/26/uk-lords-kill-attempt-to-sneak-in-new-surveillance-laws/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Scrap anonymity at web service sign-up, UK Lords advise</title>
		<link>https://gigaom.com/2014/07/29/scrap-anonymity-at-web-service-sign-up-uk-lords-advise/</link>
		<comments>https://gigaom.com/2014/07/29/scrap-anonymity-at-web-service-sign-up-uk-lords-advise/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2014 14:10:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Meyer]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bullying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House of Lords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[libel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Northern Ireland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trolling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=861045</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a report about tackling online issues like bullying and revenge porn, the Lords tentatively advised that web services should demand real names at sign-up, even if they then allow usage&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://gigaom.com/2014/07/29/scrap-anonymity-at-web-service-sign-up-uk-lords-advise/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The UK&#8217;s &#8220;emergency&#8221; DRIP surveillance law is now a done deal</title>
		<link>https://gigaom.com/2014/07/17/the-uks-emergency-drip-surveillance-law-is-now-a-done-deal/</link>
		<comments>https://gigaom.com/2014/07/17/the-uks-emergency-drip-surveillance-law-is-now-a-done-deal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2014 16:11:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Meyer]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House of Lords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Northern Ireland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surveillance]]></category>
<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NASDAQ:MSFT]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NSDQ:GOOG]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NSDQ:MSFT]]></category>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=858395</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The House of Lords passed the Data Retention and Investigatory Powers Bill on Thursday without a vote, and it received royal assent hours later. That means DRIP is law after just&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://gigaom.com/2014/07/17/the-uks-emergency-drip-surveillance-law-is-now-a-done-deal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
