<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
			xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
		>

<channel>
	<title>Gigaom Search &#187; Public Knowledge</title>
	<atom:link href="http://search.gigaom.com/tag/public-knowledge/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://search.gigaom.com</link>
	<description>Search and browse the archives</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2015 13:08:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Net Neutrality day is here: a guide to today&#8217;s vote</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2015/02/26/net-neutrality-day-is-here-a-guide-to-todays-vote/</link>
		<comments>http://gigaom.com/2015/02/26/net-neutrality-day-is-here-a-guide-to-todays-vote/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2015 12:30:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Roberts]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chairman Tom Wheeler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commissioner Ajit Pai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal-communications-commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gigi Sohn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harold Feld]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interconnection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[net neutrality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Knowledge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zero-rating]]></category>
<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NYSE:T]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NYSE:VZ]]></category>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=917321</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What is the right way to run the internet? After months of pitched debate over so-called net neutrality, the FCC will finally vote on a proposal that will prevent broadband providers from slowing down&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://gigaom.com/2015/02/26/net-neutrality-day-is-here-a-guide-to-todays-vote/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Love or hate net neutrality, GOP probe is pointlesss</title>
		<link>https://gigaom.com/2015/02/10/love-or-hate-net-neutrality-gop-probe-is-pointlesss/</link>
		<comments>https://gigaom.com/2015/02/10/love-or-hate-net-neutrality-gop-probe-is-pointlesss/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2015 21:02:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Roberts]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ajit Pai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chairman Tom Wheeler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Communications Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jason Chaffetz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[net neutrality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Knowledge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Ron Johnson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Title II]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=913843</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let the dog and pony show begin! Republicans in Congress and their cable company allies are smarting over news that the FCC will reclassify internet providers, and have responded with not one, but two&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://gigaom.com/2015/02/10/love-or-hate-net-neutrality-gop-probe-is-pointlesss/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOP calls for open internet, but more in symbol than substance</title>
		<link>https://gigaom.com/2015/01/19/gop-calls-for-open-internet-but-more-in-symbol-than-substance/</link>
		<comments>https://gigaom.com/2015/01/19/gop-calls-for-open-internet-but-more-in-symbol-than-substance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2015 15:18:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Roberts]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fred Upton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Thune]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[net neutrality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Knowledge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Title II]]></category>
<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NYSE:T]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NYSE:VZ]]></category>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=907535</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Open internet" has become one of those political catch-phrases like "freedom" or "innovation" that enjoys universal support but is rapidly losing any real meaning. Consider, for instance, the new broadband bill trotted out on Friday&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://gigaom.com/2015/01/19/gop-calls-for-open-internet-but-more-in-symbol-than-substance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Net neutrality&#8217;s cost to consumers pegged at $17B &#8212; or zero</title>
		<link>https://gigaom.com/2014/12/09/net-neutralitys-cost-to-consumers-pegged-at-17b-or-zero/</link>
		<comments>https://gigaom.com/2014/12/09/net-neutralitys-cost-to-consumers-pegged-at-17b-or-zero/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2014 18:16:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Roberts]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commissioner Ajit Pai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Communications Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[net neutrality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Knowledge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Title II]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Universal service fund]]></category>
<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NASDAQ:CMCSA]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NSDQ:CMCSA]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NYSE:T]]></category>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=898664</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After a dramatic shift in the debate over net neutrality last month, many expect the FCC will reclassify internet providers so as to bar them from giving special treatment to some websites over others. The question&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://gigaom.com/2014/12/09/net-neutralitys-cost-to-consumers-pegged-at-17b-or-zero/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FCC restarts clock on Comcast merger as critics renew attack</title>
		<link>https://gigaom.com/2014/12/03/fcc-restarts-clock-on-comcast-merger-as-critics-renew-attack/</link>
		<comments>https://gigaom.com/2014/12/03/fcc-restarts-clock-on-comcast-merger-as-critics-renew-attack/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2014 18:06:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Roberts]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antitrust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[merger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mergers acquisitions (MA)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Knowledge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stop Mega Comcast]]></category>
<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NASDAQ:CMCSA]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NSDQ:CMCSA]]></category>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=897772</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is little that's subtle about America's giant telecom beast, Comcast, and the same can be said about its critics. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://gigaom.com/2014/12/03/fcc-restarts-clock-on-comcast-merger-as-critics-renew-attack/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More sites offer &#8220;free data&#8221; to mobile users, raising stakes in net neutrality debate</title>
		<link>https://gigaom.com/2014/10/27/more-sites-offer-free-data-to-mobile-users-raising-stakes-in-net-neutrality-debate/</link>
		<comments>https://gigaom.com/2014/10/27/more-sites-offer-free-data-to-mobile-users-raising-stakes-in-net-neutrality-debate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2014 15:18:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Roberts]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fast lanes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Knowledge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zero-rating]]></category>
<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NASDAQ:NFLX]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NSDQ:NFLX]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NYSE:PCS]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NYSE:T]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NYSE:VZ]]></category>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=883857</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Companies are encouraging mobile customers to visit their websites by paying the data fees to AT&#38;T and other carriers. Is this a bad thing?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://gigaom.com/2014/10/27/more-sites-offer-free-data-to-mobile-users-raising-stakes-in-net-neutrality-debate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will the FCC be tempted by AT&amp;T&#8217;s suggestion of internet &#8216;fast lanes&#8217; run by users?</title>
		<link>https://gigaom.com/2014/10/07/will-the-fcc-be-tempted-by-atts-suggestion-of-internet-fast-lanes-run-by-users/</link>
		<comments>https://gigaom.com/2014/10/07/will-the-fcc-be-tempted-by-atts-suggestion-of-internet-fast-lanes-run-by-users/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2014 18:01:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Roberts]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barbara van Schewick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Communications Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet service providers (ISPs)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[isp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[net neutrality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Knowledge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Title II]]></category>
<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NASDAQ:CMCSA]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NASDAQ:NFLX]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NSDQ:CMCSA]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NSDQ:NFLX]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NYSE:T]]></category>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=878858</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What if the FCC could solve net neutrality in a way that pleased both industry and consumer advocates? User-directed fast lanes hold out that promise in theory -- but might be&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://gigaom.com/2014/10/07/will-the-fcc-be-tempted-by-atts-suggestion-of-internet-fast-lanes-run-by-users/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Should you have a right to sell your ebooks and digital music?</title>
		<link>https://gigaom.com/2014/06/06/should-you-have-a-right-to-sell-your-ebooks-and-digital-music/</link>
		<comments>https://gigaom.com/2014/06/06/should-you-have-a-right-to-sell-your-ebooks-and-digital-music/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2014 12:39:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Roberts]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer electronics manufacturers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright-law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[first sale doctrine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House Judiciary Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Ossenmacher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kirtsaeng]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[licensing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york public library]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Knowledge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rep. Bob Goodlatte]]></category>
<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NASDAQ:AAPL]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NSDQ:AAPL]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NSDQ:AMZN]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NYSE:BKS]]></category>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=847368</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How should the first sale doctrine apply to digital goods? Members of Congress came to New York to hear the opinions of publishing executives, librarians and others.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://gigaom.com/2014/06/06/should-you-have-a-right-to-sell-your-ebooks-and-digital-music/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Could crowdsourcing be a better way to make legislation?</title>
		<link>https://gigaom.com/2012/02/28/could-crowdsourcing-be-a-better-way-to-make-legislation/</link>
		<comments>https://gigaom.com/2012/02/28/could-crowdsourcing-be-a-better-way-to-make-legislation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 22:49:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mathew Ingram]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crowdsourcing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pipa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Knowledge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=491266</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In an attempt to come up with better laws on copyright, Reddit is crowdsourcing the creation of a Free Internet Act, while Public Knowledge is trying to introduce its own alternatives&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://gigaom.com/2012/02/28/could-crowdsourcing-be-a-better-way-to-make-legislation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fight Over &#8220;Selectable Output Control&#8221; DRM Heats Up</title>
		<link>https://gigaom.com/2009/11/05/fight-over-selectable-output-control-drm-heats-up/</link>
		<comments>https://gigaom.com/2009/11/05/fight-over-selectable-output-control-drm-heats-up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 16:41:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Albrecht]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Knowledge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[selectable output control]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newteevee.com/?p=34195</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA) and the advocacy group Public Knowledge sent tit-for-tat letters to the FCC yesterday over the issue of Selectable Output Control (SOC). The MPAA has&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://gigaom.com/2009/11/05/fight-over-selectable-output-control-drm-heats-up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>