<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
			xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
		>

<channel>
	<title>Gigaom Search &#187; second circuit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://search.gigaom.com/tag/second-circuit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://search.gigaom.com</link>
	<description>Search and browse the archives</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2015 13:08:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Apple monitor under fire for $2.6M bill, &#8220;roving inquisition&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2015/02/17/apple-monitor-under-fire-for-2-6m-bill-roving-inquisition/</link>
		<comments>http://gigaom.com/2015/02/17/apple-monitor-under-fire-for-2-6m-bill-roving-inquisition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2015 19:57:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Roberts]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antitrust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judge denise cote]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Bromwich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York federal court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[second circuit]]></category>
<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NASDAQ:AAPL]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NSDQ:AAPL]]></category>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=915271</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The lawyer overseeing an Apple antitrust order is a political hack who has run roughshod over the judicial process during ten visits to the company's Cupertino headquarters, a Wall Street Journal editorial charged Tuesday, and&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://gigaom.com/2015/02/17/apple-monitor-under-fire-for-2-6m-bill-roving-inquisition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SiriusXM can fight windfall for &#8217;60s singers, judge rules</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2015/02/11/siriusxm-can-fight-windfall-for-60s-singers-judge-rules/</link>
		<comments>http://gigaom.com/2015/02/11/siriusxm-can-fight-windfall-for-60s-singers-judge-rules/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2015 22:35:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Roberts]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flo & Eddie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Colleen McMahon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pre-1972 sound recordings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[second circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SiriusXM]]></category>
<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NYSE:P]]></category>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=914311</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Music lovers finally caught a break this week as a federal judge ruled SiriusXM can appeal a jaw-dropping ruling that created a new type of copyright royalty, and that could oblige digital media companies&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://gigaom.com/2015/02/11/siriusxm-can-fight-windfall-for-60s-singers-judge-rules/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Judges question Apple ebook verdict and Amazon&#8217;s role</title>
		<link>https://gigaom.com/2014/12/15/judges-question-apple-ebook-verdict-and-amazons-role/</link>
		<comments>https://gigaom.com/2014/12/15/judges-question-apple-ebook-verdict-and-amazons-role/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2014 20:45:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Roberts]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antitrust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[price-fixing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[second circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Simon & Schuster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theodore Boutros]]></category>
<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NASDAQ:AAPL]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NASDAQ:AMZN]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NSDQ:AAPL]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NSDQ:AMZN]]></category>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=900372</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a new twist in the long running antitrust case against Apple, an appeals court on Monday cast doubt on the Justice Department's theory that the company brokered an illegal conspiracy among book&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://gigaom.com/2014/12/15/judges-question-apple-ebook-verdict-and-amazons-role/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple ebooks damages trial to start July 14 after appeals court refuses delay</title>
		<link>https://gigaom.com/2014/05/30/apple-ebooks-damages-trial-to-start-july-14-after-appeals-court-refuses-delay/</link>
		<comments>https://gigaom.com/2014/05/30/apple-ebooks-damages-trial-to-start-july-14-after-appeals-court-refuses-delay/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2014 17:45:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Roberts]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti-trust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antitrust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[class action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer electronics manufacturers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hagens berman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[second circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Berman]]></category>
<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NASDAQ:AAPL]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NSDQ:AAPL]]></category>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=845968</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A trial in July will determine how much Apple will pay in punishment for fixing ebook prices. A lead lawyer says the tab could be over $800 million.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://gigaom.com/2014/05/30/apple-ebooks-damages-trial-to-start-july-14-after-appeals-court-refuses-delay/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Appeals court has harsh words for Apple and DOJ in fight over antitrust monitor</title>
		<link>https://gigaom.com/2014/02/04/appeals-court-has-harsh-words-for-apple-and-justice-dept-in-fight-over-anti-trust-monitor/</link>
		<comments>https://gigaom.com/2014/02/04/appeals-court-has-harsh-words-for-apple-and-justice-dept-in-fight-over-anti-trust-monitor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2014 17:48:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Roberts]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antitrust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice Pierre Leval]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Bromwich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[second circuit]]></category>
<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NASDAQ:AAPL]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NSDQ:AAPL]]></category>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=813741</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apple is fighting a court order that imposes a monitor to investigate the company -- at Apple's expense. On Tuesday, Apple and the Justice Department sparred over whether the monitor should&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://gigaom.com/2014/02/04/appeals-court-has-harsh-words-for-apple-and-justice-dept-in-fight-over-anti-trust-monitor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Appeals court refuses to rehear Aereo case, service can keep streaming</title>
		<link>https://gigaom.com/2013/07/16/appeals-court-refuses-to-rehear-aereo-case-service-will-keep-streaming/</link>
		<comments>https://gigaom.com/2013/07/16/appeals-court-refuses-to-rehear-aereo-case-service-will-keep-streaming/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jul 2013 16:04:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Roberts]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broadcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broadcasters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[second circuit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=667917</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Second Circuit Court of Appeals refused broadcasters' petition for an en banc appeal of an earlier ruling that says Aereo is legal. The service will thus stream on in New&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://gigaom.com/2013/07/16/appeals-court-refuses-to-rehear-aereo-case-service-will-keep-streaming/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple faces triple damages, longshot appeal in ebook conspiracy</title>
		<link>https://gigaom.com/2013/07/11/apple-faces-triple-damages-longshot-appeal-in-ebook-conspiracy/</link>
		<comments>https://gigaom.com/2013/07/11/apple-faces-triple-damages-longshot-appeal-in-ebook-conspiracy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jul 2013 13:03:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Roberts]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[andre barlow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antitrust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clayton Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Balto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hagens berman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[second circuit]]></category>
<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NASDAQ:AAPL]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NSDQ:AAPL]]></category>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.org/?p=231972</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apple is likely to pay more than the $166 million that publishers paid for their role in an ebook conspiracy. The higher amount relates to a triple damages rule and Apple's&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://gigaom.com/2013/07/11/apple-faces-triple-damages-longshot-appeal-in-ebook-conspiracy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Aereo fight moves to Boston with new TV lawsuit</title>
		<link>https://gigaom.com/2013/07/10/aereo-fight-moves-to-boston-with-new-tv-lawsuit/</link>
		<comments>https://gigaom.com/2013/07/10/aereo-fight-moves-to-boston-with-new-tv-lawsuit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2013 13:18:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Roberts]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[barry diller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright-law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[second circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WCVB]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=665822</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Should Americans be able to buy small bundles of TV to watch on their mobile device? The legal fight over that question moved to Boston this week.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://gigaom.com/2013/07/10/aereo-fight-moves-to-boston-with-new-tv-lawsuit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>At close of ebook trial, Apple gains ground: what lies ahead</title>
		<link>https://gigaom.com/2013/06/24/at-close-of-ebook-trial-apple-gains-ground-what-lies-ahead/</link>
		<comments>https://gigaom.com/2013/06/24/at-close-of-ebook-trial-apple-gains-ground-what-lies-ahead/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2013 14:22:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Roberts]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antitrust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple ebook case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple ebook trial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-book lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ebook trial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[price-fixing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[second circuit]]></category>
<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NASDAQ:AAPL]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NASDAQ:AMZN]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NASDAQ:GOOG]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NSDQ:AAPL]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NSDQ:AMZN]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NSDQ:GOOG]]></category>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.org/?p=231426</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At the start of Apple's price-fixing trial, it looked like the company stood no chance. Things look different now: here's an analysis and expert opinion about what happens next.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://gigaom.com/2013/06/24/at-close-of-ebook-trial-apple-gains-ground-what-lies-ahead/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Court backs artist in Rasta case: less copyright control for image owners?</title>
		<link>https://gigaom.com/2013/04/29/court-backs-artist-in-rasta-case-less-copyright-control-for-image-owners/</link>
		<comments>https://gigaom.com/2013/04/29/court-backs-artist-in-rasta-case-less-copyright-control-for-image-owners/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 13:02:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Roberts]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appeals court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright-law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fair-use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patrick Cariou]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Prince]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[second circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transformative]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.org/?p=228647</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When is the use of another artist's image "transformative" and when is it just copyright infringement? A major court ruling provides broader protection for appropriation artists.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://gigaom.com/2013/04/29/court-backs-artist-in-rasta-case-less-copyright-control-for-image-owners/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>