<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
			xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
		>

<channel>
	<title>Gigaom Search &#187; Technologies and Products &#187; H.264</title>
	<atom:link href="http://search.gigaom.com/technology/h-264/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://search.gigaom.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2015 13:08:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>H.264 support arrives in Firefox, thanks to Cisco &#8212;  but H.264 web videos still won’t play</title>
		<link>https://gigaom.com/2014/10/14/h-264-support-arrives-in-firefox-thanks-to-cisco-but-h-264-web-videos-still-wont-play/</link>
		<comments>https://gigaom.com/2014/10/14/h-264-support-arrives-in-firefox-thanks-to-cisco-but-h-264-web-videos-still-wont-play/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2014 17:57:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Janko Roettgers]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[html5 video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video chat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VP8]]></category>
<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NSDQ:CSCO]]></category>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=880770</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Firefox is now supporting H.264 for web-based video chat, thanks to a binary component provided by Cisco -- but H.264 web video streams still can't be played natively in the browser.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://gigaom.com/2014/10/14/h-264-support-arrives-in-firefox-thanks-to-cisco-but-h-264-web-videos-still-wont-play/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Inside LA&#8217;s TV channel sharing trial: Can broadcasters part with their airwaves?</title>
		<link>https://gigaom.com/2014/03/27/inside-las-tv-channel-sharing-trial-can-broadcasters-part-with-their-airwaves/</link>
		<comments>https://gigaom.com/2014/03/27/inside-las-tv-channel-sharing-trial-can-broadcasters-part-with-their-airwaves/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2014 13:38:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin Fitchard]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[broadcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broadcast TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=828563</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The TV airwaves over Los Angeles got a bit more crowded last month as two stations tested whether sharing the same broadcast channel is feasible. Their report could determine whether the&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://gigaom.com/2014/03/27/inside-las-tv-channel-sharing-trial-can-broadcasters-part-with-their-airwaves/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wikimedia is considering support for H.264 video codec to boost video on Wikipedia</title>
		<link>https://gigaom.com/2014/01/16/wikimedia-wikipedia-mp4-h264-support/</link>
		<comments>https://gigaom.com/2014/01/16/wikimedia-wikipedia-mp4-h264-support/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2014 18:49:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Janko Roettgers]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MP4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ogg Theora]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open media formats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wikimedia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=792544</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wikipedia has traditionally only accepted open media formats. But now it's considering a change in  tune to finally get more video contributions.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://gigaom.com/2014/01/16/wikimedia-wikipedia-mp4-h264-support/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wikimedia is considering support for H.264 video codec to boost video on Wikipedia</title>
		<link>https://gigaom.com/2014/01/16/wikimedia-wikipedia-mp4-h264-support/</link>
		<comments>https://gigaom.com/2014/01/16/wikimedia-wikipedia-mp4-h264-support/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2014 18:49:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Janko Roettgers]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MP4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ogg Theora]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open media formats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wikimedia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=792544</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wikipedia has traditionally only accepted open media formats. But now it's considering a change in  tune to finally get more video contributions.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://gigaom.com/2014/01/16/wikimedia-wikipedia-mp4-h264-support/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Anatomy of a stalemate: Why is everyone still fighting about WebRTC?</title>
		<link>https://gigaom.com/2013/11/18/anatomy-of-a-stalemate-why-is-everyone-still-fighting-about-webrtc/</link>
		<comments>https://gigaom.com/2013/11/18/anatomy-of-a-stalemate-why-is-everyone-still-fighting-about-webrtc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Nov 2013 18:38:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Janko Roettgers]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IETF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RTCWeb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VP8]]></category>
<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NASDAQ:GOOG]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NSDQ:CSCO]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NSDQ:GOOG]]></category>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=716112</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Video chatting could soon get a whole lot easier -- if only the major browser makers could agree on a common standard. So what's WebRTC, and why are folks still fighting&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://gigaom.com/2013/11/18/anatomy-of-a-stalemate-why-is-everyone-still-fighting-about-webrtc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Despite Cisco proposal, no agreement on WebRTC codec</title>
		<link>https://gigaom.com/2013/11/08/despite-cisco-proposal-no-agreement-on-webrtc-codec/</link>
		<comments>https://gigaom.com/2013/11/08/despite-cisco-proposal-no-agreement-on-webrtc-codec/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Nov 2013 00:17:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Janko Roettgers]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VP8]]></category>
<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NASDAQ:GOOG]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NSDQ:CSCO]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NSDQ:GOOG]]></category>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=714378</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This week's IETF meeting in Vancouver has ended without a decision on a mandatory video codec for WebRTC, the proposed standard for real-time voice and video communication. Browser makers, videoconferencing equipment&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://gigaom.com/2013/11/08/despite-cisco-proposal-no-agreement-on-webrtc-codec/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google sticks with VP8, opposes Cisco’s push to make H.264 the default codec for WebRTC</title>
		<link>https://gigaom.com/2013/10/30/google-sticks-with-vp8-opposes-ciscos-push-for-h-264/</link>
		<comments>https://gigaom.com/2013/10/30/google-sticks-with-vp8-opposes-ciscos-push-for-h-264/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Oct 2013 19:40:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Janko Roettgers]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Videotelephony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VP8]]></category>
<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NASDAQ:GOOG]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NSDQ:CSCO]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NSDQ:GOOG]]></category>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=710662</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cisco may have landed a surprise coup to push for H.264, but Google still thinks that VP8 is the best codec for real-time communication on the web.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://gigaom.com/2013/10/30/google-sticks-with-vp8-opposes-ciscos-push-for-h-264/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mozilla will add H.264 to Firefox as Cisco makes eleventh-hour push for WebRTC’s future</title>
		<link>https://gigaom.com/2013/10/30/mozilla-will-add-h-264-to-firefox-as-cisco-makes-eleventh-hour-push-for-webrtcs-future/</link>
		<comments>https://gigaom.com/2013/10/30/mozilla-will-add-h-264-to-firefox-as-cisco-makes-eleventh-hour-push-for-webrtcs-future/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Oct 2013 12:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Janko Roettgers]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VP8]]></category>
<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NASDAQ:GOOG]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NSDQ:CSCO]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NSDQ:GOOG]]></category>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=710348</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After long resisting proprietary media formats, Mozilla has agreed to add H.264 to its browser. The move is made possible through a partnership with Cisco, which wants to press the industry&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://gigaom.com/2013/10/30/mozilla-will-add-h-264-to-firefox-as-cisco-makes-eleventh-hour-push-for-webrtcs-future/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google starts using HTML5 and WebM for premium content</title>
		<link>https://gigaom.com/2013/02/27/google-webm-video-rentals/</link>
		<comments>https://gigaom.com/2013/02/27/google-webm-video-rentals/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 23:32:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Janko Roettgers]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Luther]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VP8]]></category>
<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NASDAQ:GOOG]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NSDQ:GOOG]]></category>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=615164</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some Chromebook owners are getting their Google Play video rentals in WebM, thanks to new HTML5 video security. And Google is already working hard on a next-generation video codec.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://gigaom.com/2013/02/27/google-webm-video-rentals/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Motorola&#8217;s German win over Microsoft really means</title>
		<link>https://gigaom.com/2012/05/02/what-motorolas-german-win-over-microsoft-really-means/</link>
		<comments>https://gigaom.com/2012/05/02/what-motorolas-german-win-over-microsoft-really-means/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 13:50:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Meyer]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[frand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany]]></category>
<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NASDAQ:MSFT]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NSDQ:MSFT]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NYSE:MMI]]></category>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=516734</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Motorola has won an injunction in Germany on key Microsoft products involved in a patent dispute. But in a confusing and complex judgment, the chances of Motorola actually trying to get&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://gigaom.com/2012/05/02/what-motorolas-german-win-over-microsoft-really-means/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>