<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
			xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
		>

<channel>
	<title>Gigaom Search &#187; Technologies and Products &#187; peering</title>
	<atom:link href="http://search.gigaom.com/technology/peering/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://search.gigaom.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2015 13:08:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>5 reasons the FCC might be wrong about net neutrality</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2015/02/28/5-reasons-the-fcc-might-be-wrong-about-net-neutrality/</link>
		<comments>http://gigaom.com/2015/02/28/5-reasons-the-fcc-might-be-wrong-about-net-neutrality/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2015 15:00:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Vanian]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet service providers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet service providers (ISPs)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[net neutrality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Network Neutrality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Structure Show]]></category>
<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NASDAQ:AAPL]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NASDAQ:CMCSA]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NASDAQ:GOOG]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NSDQ:AAPL]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NSDQ:CMCSA]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NSDQ:GOOG]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NYSE:T]]></category>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=917850</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This week the FCC passed new rules on net neutrality, which were essentially designed to limit the ability of internet service providers (ISP) to either slow down or boost the speeds&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://gigaom.com/2015/02/28/5-reasons-the-fcc-might-be-wrong-about-net-neutrality/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>47</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://traffic.libsyn.com/gigaom/022515a_01-AudioMp3.mp3" length="38377492" type="audio/mpeg" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The FCC&#8217;s net neutrality proposal is awesome, but has a loophole</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2015/02/04/the-fccs-net-neutrality-proposal-is-awesome-but-has-a-loophole/</link>
		<comments>http://gigaom.com/2015/02/04/the-fccs-net-neutrality-proposal-is-awesome-but-has-a-loophole/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2015 21:05:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stacey Higginbotham]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[net neutrality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Network Neutrality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wireless broadband networks]]></category>
<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NASDAQ:CMCSA]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NASDAQ:FB]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NASDAQ:GOOG]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NASDAQ:NFLX]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NSDQ:CMCSA]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NSDQ:FB]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NSDQ:GOOG]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NSDQ:NFLX]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NYSE:PCS]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NYSE:T]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NYSE:VZ]]></category>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=912448</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler has taken the unprecedented and awesome step of using Title II to ensure that the internet remains open and that ISPs cannot discriminate against the type of&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://gigaom.com/2015/02/04/the-fccs-net-neutrality-proposal-is-awesome-but-has-a-loophole/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>If Comcast&#8217;s Brian Roberts thinks he&#8217;s the postman, Netflix&#8217;s Reed Hastings thinks he&#8217;s the taxman</title>
		<link>https://gigaom.com/2014/05/29/if-comcasts-brian-roberts-thinks-hes-the-postman-netflixs-reed-hastings-thinks-hes-the-taxman/</link>
		<comments>https://gigaom.com/2014/05/29/if-comcasts-brian-roberts-thinks-hes-the-postman-netflixs-reed-hastings-thinks-hes-the-taxman/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2014 17:40:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Krazit]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Code Conference 2014]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[net neutrality]]></category>
<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NASDAQ:CMCSA]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NSDQ:CMCSA]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NSDQ:NFLX]]></category>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=845569</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nobody likes the taxman. The latest chapter in the fundamental disagreement between Netflix and Comcast over who should pay for the improvement of the internet unfolded Thursday.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://gigaom.com/2014/05/29/if-comcasts-brian-roberts-thinks-hes-the-postman-netflixs-reed-hastings-thinks-hes-the-taxman/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>YouTube starts rating US ISPs, puts its weight behind settlement-free peering</title>
		<link>https://gigaom.com/2014/05/29/youtube-starts-rating-u-s-isps-puts-its-weight-behind-settlement-free-peering/</link>
		<comments>https://gigaom.com/2014/05/29/youtube-starts-rating-u-s-isps-puts-its-weight-behind-settlement-free-peering/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2014 16:00:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Janko Roettgers]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ISP speed index]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video quality report]]></category>
<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NSDQ:GOOG]]></category>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=845506</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google wants you to know which ISPs provide the best streaming experience, and it wants ISPs to work with it to ensure HD-quality streams without buffering.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://gigaom.com/2014/05/29/youtube-starts-rating-u-s-isps-puts-its-weight-behind-settlement-free-peering/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Comcast is now the third-fastest US ISP for Netflix streaming</title>
		<link>https://gigaom.com/2014/05/12/comcast-is-now-the-third-fastest-us-isp-for-netflix-streaming/</link>
		<comments>https://gigaom.com/2014/05/12/comcast-is-now-the-third-fastest-us-isp-for-netflix-streaming/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2014 17:59:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Janko Roettgers]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ISP speed index]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[network speeds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paid peering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peering]]></category>
<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NASDAQ:CMCSA]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NSDQ:CMCSA]]></category>
		<category domain="http://search.gigaom.com/stock/"><![CDATA[NSDQ:NFLX]]></category>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=840962</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good news for Comcast customers: Your Netflix streams just got a lot better-looking, thanks to speed increases that are the result of a commercial peering agreement.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://gigaom.com/2014/05/12/comcast-is-now-the-third-fastest-us-isp-for-netflix-streaming/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>